Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Fox who wrote (65200)	9/21/1998 8:34:00 PM
From: Joseph S. Lione	Respond to of 186894

OTOTOTOTOTOT Jeff - you said "There should be a law that all Congressmen who vote on this issue must answer the following question under oath: "Are you now having or have you ever had sexual contact with another person other than your wife?" Please define "sexual contact".

To: Jeff Fox who wrote (65200)	9/21/1998 8:57:00 PM
From: Dale J.	Respond to of 186894

Jeff, re:"Are you now having or have you ever had sexual contact with another person other than your wife?" It depends on what you mean by "sexual contact". What do you mean by wife. Anyones wife? It depends on how you define "another person". <ggg> Seriously. I don't like this either and I can't blame the President for refusing to answer some of those questions. It seems if you get accused of sexual harassment all your privacy rights are immediately annulled. We saw it with Clarence Thomas and we are seeing it again with Clinton. The federal guidelines on sexual harassment that were written mostly by the Democrates (under some duress from the feminists) need to be overhauled. Lewinkski should have been asked one question: did the President harass you in anyway. If the answer is no, then the questions should have stopped from a legal standpoint. Dale