Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kennbill who wrote (26460)	9/21/1998 8:33:00 PM
From: woody	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Lets leave FTEL out of this....

To: kennbill who wrote (26460)	9/22/1998 4:05:00 AM
From: DavidCG	Respond to of 50264

<<<As for FTEL. I'd bet on Jimmy Chin any day over Frank Peters!!>>> A question: Why? Mind you, Frank Peters is no perfect CEO. But look at his accomplishments: 1.)He rasied Capital when he has needed it to expand. 2.)FTEL is a fully reporting company to the SEC (which does not make FTEL inherently better than DGIV...just more credible to new investors) 3.)FTEL is now generating company revenues in three areas: a.) Gateway box sales b.) IP Telephony phone call revenues from Guatemala, Bosnia, and the United Kingdom (England, Ireland, Scotland, Wales) c.) As an internet service provider. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> These past 100 DGIV messages are quite entertaining to me because I am sure no one invested in DGIV just because they might report their financials to the SEC. I mean, no one is expecting any big revenues from the first SEC report, correct? No. I think people mainly invested in DGIV because of the future potential of DGIV to connect the Pacific Rim via Internet Telephony. Correct me if I am wrong in this assumption. The only way that the SEC report really benefits DGIV is that by DGIV not filing now, you might not get new investor money because "new money" might want to see DGIV's financials. However, the money that is currently in DGIV stock shouldn't be drawn out in mass quantities due to a SEC report, should it? I have followed DGIV from March and I can tell you, contracts and revenues drove DGIV stock higher in March/April. Not audited financials. They simply did not have the weight that everyone is giving them today. I guess tomorrow will tell the tale how much importance a SEC filing delay has. Good Luck DGIVites! -DavidCG