SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: j g cordes who wrote (6694)9/21/1998 8:44:00 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
Hi j g cordes; This morning the TVs we keep running in the
trading office (with that program with the little ticker running
across the bottom of the screen) had almost nothing but
Clinton on, and it was dull as hell.

Of course I was trading, but the only really perjurious thing
I saw was his claim that he could not remember being
alone with Monica.

It may be that he has successfully avoided technical
perjury, but if this is so, then it is the worst disaster in
our nation's recent legal history.

The obvious effect would be for witnesses to avoid
telling the truth, and the whole truth. I suppose they
would still tell nothing but the truth.

The less obvious effect would be for lawyers to have
to ask numerous, extraordinarily worded questions to
defendants in order to avoid semantic crap. If we,
as a people, are unable to agree on what simple
English means, we are unable to determine what
truth or guilt are, and we should probably return to
the monarchy once prevalent in the world. At least
you would then know who was on your side.

On the other hand, if Clinton had been before a judge,
he would have been forced to answer the questions
he avoided by misdirection. The judge would order
him to respond.

As I said before, these offenses are impeachable, but
I don't think he will resign until the other Starr reports
hit the fan. That should be before the election.

The local democratic party operatives are horrified by
what they see happening in November, according
to the paper this morning. I'll post a link when I find
one...

-- Carl



To: j g cordes who wrote (6694)9/21/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 13994
 
In Part four the prosecutor proves beyond anyone's doubt that the President committed perjury.

clintonvideo.broadcast.com

The question is do the American people care whether their President lyed under oath?

Michael