Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Walt who wrote (8074)	9/21/1998 11:45:00 PM
From: bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

Thanks Walt.Geo 101 is a help. I'm assuming that ABZ is back in because they think those step out holes are going to lead to a source. They've got three trains heading into the lake. Even if, when the trains are plotted, there is some question about an exact direction, shouldn't they be able to fix an intersection within a reasonably small area and, over the summer, have done some tests to determine if there is a difference in the geophysics of the bottom of the lake? Could it be that the trains of rocks are remnants of weathered dikes rather than material thrown out by an volcanic explosion?(I think that in an earlier discussion someone had some evidence that this was unlikely but i don't remember the proof or its significance.) Even if that is true, and if the dikes or dike remnants all indicate a central source, is it possible that the central source is itself simply a widening of the dikes and, therefore, quite small? If that is the case, then would you hold by your theory of the burp, with the main body of kimberlite lying at depth below this central location? If so,then George's repeated suggestion that WSP is not drilling deep enough would be true, would it not. Are you back in town now until freezeup?