To: bob zagorin who wrote (25608 ) 9/22/1998 9:25:00 AM From: jayhawk969 Respond to of 32384
Bob,fwiw, i still think there are several on this thread who are really short the stock and trying to discredit management. i'm not going to get into names but it is only logical to expect people to follow their own interests. if they're long, they're not going to talk it down and vice versa. doesn't mean they shouldn't post but perhaps we need a little perspective when listening to their moaning and groaning. I am reaching to see the rationality in your post. It is quite obvious that if one only listened to the good DR. and other yeahsayers one would find themselves in the tank. This board desperately needs balance. When a board has a strong personality with credentials that only identifies(hypes?) the positive, strong counterbalancing measures are required. It is interesting to note the similarity to guerilla warfare against a dictator(only avenue available). Almost without fail "negative" rational comments are ignored, snubbed, discredited or in some other manner diminished. Worse, it often degrades to a personal attack rather than taking the high road and focusing on content.<I agree this is not one sided>. A good investor will evaluate the positives and negatives of his investment. Inquiry is not unhealthy, aucontraire. This company including management is suspect in many areas, might I suggest communications, internet technology, finance. If and investor has no doubts or questions, I suggest they are living a fairy tale with a predictable ending. Bob, I have been and remain a long, however, I have and will continue to raise the issues of dilution, and cash. If the good Dr. will not look at both sides of the issue(and substantially raise his own credibility), then the rest of this board must do so. Bob, Do you not have any concerns about this stock, its management, its practices? J.D.