Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (9974)	9/22/1998 8:55:00 AM
From: Steve Andrew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11098

GV.... Scott's own words change as often as it suits him for his own personal PRST P.R. campaign. He obviously understands enough of the printing business to conduct this P.R. campaign but sorely misses the reality of the world that has left PRST behind. His reliance on every piece of company spin is a joke and has made him the ultimate PRST shill for a world that no longer values the company as anything substantial. He consistently fails to understand the dynamic of Wall St. and convieniently forgets the stock's documentable past as another manipulated and hyped issue out of the Howard clan. He has sadly become a pathological denialist and a greatly unprofitable one at that. I really almost feel sorry for him as he continues to rabidly defend this name. I have had my share of losers as well, but am constantly aware of those old maxims..."cut your losses and let your profits run...take a loss and learn from it so you don't repeat it again, and ...NEVER FALL IN LOVE WITH A STOCK...only your wife, children and pets." He refuses to accept that PRST's past partners have given up on this company and its past investors have moved on to the next momentum scam and left poor little PRST, and poorer little Scotty to carry its torch. One day, I suspect he will learn his lesson from this and realize how ignorant his analytical skills are....until then he has considerable humor value IMO. Good Hunting to You. Steve

To: GVTucker who wrote (9974)	9/22/1998 10:09:00 AM
From: SG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11098

GV, thanks for the post of info from Heidelberg. It was a good read. As for my post regarding the royalty of PRST, it was in response to a request by others of Jim Shircliff and I to trade places and try and support the other side for once. How convenient that you only post my fictitious bearish position without the benefit of Jim Shirc's bullish stand. At least you can be some what objective in keeping the real issue at hand. That is that we are talking about PRST and not each other as Steve seems addicted to. I stand behind my belief that PRST must maintain control of the "DI" technology. The article did not say that Heidelberg was not paying nor would it. It would also not say it was, just as it does not talk about the on going licensing of technology in the QM-DI+. Heidelberg would not use that forum to stand up and shout, one way or another the issue of royalties and or license. It did use on several occations the term Direct Imaging. Heidelberg is clearly in favor of this great technology and will continue with its development. Further more, many others will use Heidelberg as an ice breaker to clear the way ahead. "DI" is here to stay and so is the no-process plates that are required to use such technology. No crushing blow yet. Time is clearly running out. My opinion only SG