SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton -- doomed & wagging, Japan collapses, Y2K bug, etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (429)9/22/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Wall Street Journal - 09/22/98

LDP Is Accused of Backing Rural Interests As Banking Crisis Masks Political Conflicts

By JATHON SAPSFORD Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

TOKYO -- Behind the fight over Japan's banking mess is a clash between the country's entrenched rural interests and its overtaxed and angry urban population -- a dispute having consequences that are starting to ripple around the world.

The inability of these two feuding forces to come to terms over a banking- workout plan helped to trigger a global stock-market hiccup on Monday. Only last week, Japan's governing Liberal Democratic Party, which draws much of its support from the countryside, and the opposition, increasingly representing urban voters, had proclaimed a landmark agreement on banking reform. Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi declared he had a gift of a solid banking plan to take to his meeting with President Clinton Tuesday.

Accord Is Unraveling

But even before Mr. Obuchi arrived in New York, the agreement was unraveling in Tokyo, with the LDP and the opposition yelling at each other on Japan's weekend political talk shows. By Monday, the mood had soured. As Japan's politicians kept bickering, foreign investors sold shares on fears that the impasse over the banking mess will drive the Japanese economy deeper into recession.

On Monday, the benchmark Nikkei stock average fell 385.82 points, or 2.8%, to close at 13597.30. Leading the decline were big banks, steel companies and electronicgoods makers. Until recently, these were the favorite issues of foreign investors, who sold a net $2.07 billion in Japanese stocks last week alone. In Europe, major markets slipped 1% or more, with the Xetra DAX Index in Germany off a full 4%.

Downgrading Japan

Pessimism caused British credit-rating service Fitch IBCA to strip Japan of its triple-A foreign-currency rating on Monday. "Foreign investors have already been moving out of Japanese assets, and Japanese investors could soon follow them, provoking a fall in the yen," Fitch said upon cutting that rating to double-A-plus. Among
reasons for the downgrade was Japan's "deteriorating" banking system.

The Nikkei recovered a bit early Tuesday morning on news that the LDP was seeking to compromise with the opposition in a plan to support weak banks. But by the close of the morning session, the average was down 31.92 points to 13565.38.

Traders said Mr. Obuchi helped lift prices early by downplaying the rift with the opposition. But in Tokyo the outlook for banking reform was anything but clear, and the continuing worries helped send share prices back down.

Yet special interests make the banking mess intractable. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party has long lavished the countryside with public-works spending and other fiscal largess. Now the opposition accuses the government of planning to pump tax money into the banking system as a backhanded way of letting rural agricultural cooperatives and sleepy credit associations off the hook for lending to deadbeats.

"They just want public money to rescue agricultural cooperatives," said Motohisa Ikeda, a senior member of the opposition Democratic Party. It's "political," he added.

Case in Point

For a case in point, consider the fight over the fate of the struggling Long-Term Credit Bank of Japan Ltd. The opposition has long wanted to temporarily natonalize LTCB, then dissolve the bank in an orderly manner; on Friday, some in the LDP had apparently agreed to those plans instead of pumping LTCB full of public money and marrying it off to another bank in a rescue merger.

But many LDP lawmakers still want to sink public money into LTCB, which in exchange has agreed to forgive a huge swathe of loans to three affiliates, including a troubled leasing company called Japan Leasing Corp. The catch is that freeing Japan Leasing from its loan obligations to LTCB would allow the affiliate to pay back about
$3 billion it has borrowed from dozens of agricultural cooperatives and credit associations.

To the opposition, this is a raw deal in which LTCB gets public money to forgive loans to a weak borrower -- just so that borrower can pay back money it owes to rural constituents of the LDP. "City folks in Japan are the taxpayers," said Yoshito Sengoku of the Democrats, who tend to draw urban voters. "Country people are tax eaters."

The LDP counters that it is just trying to preserve the financial system, which, after all, is why the party created a public credit line of $100 billion intended for shoring up weak but worthy banks earlier this year. "How can we avoid using public money?" asked Yoshiro Mori, an LDP party leader, at a news conference on Monday.

Too Exposed to Fail

Some LDP leaders also insist the agricultural cooperatives are too exposed to fail. One adviser to the government, who asked not to be named, noted that rural credit cooperatives have no deposit insurance
scheme. Without such a safety net, it would be imprudent to force these "fragile institutions" to take losses, he said. Sinking money into LTCB, the official said, would ease the burden on the credit cooperatives.

To opposition politicians, the fight over public funds has grown so fierce that they even accuse Washington of siding with the LDP. Over the past week, U.S. officials from U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin on down have pointedly reminded Japan that they think public money will be necessary not only to protect the depositors of failed banks, but also to recapitalize ones that are weak but still viable.

Opposition leader Naoto Kan, however, feels betrayed. American officials have spent the last year preaching to Asians on the need for belt tightening, job cuts and austerity, he said. Now, the Americans are suddenly telling Japan to rescue banks rather then letting them go under. "That's just a little contradictory, don't you think?" Mr.
Kan said in an interview.

Instead, Mr. Kan simply insists that banks shouldn't receive any public funds until shareholders are first wiped out and managers lose their jobs -- hardly the sort of talk that will calm stock markets. "Then we can consider public money," he said. "But first people must take responsibility for their mistakes."



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (429)9/22/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Wall Street Journal - 09/22/98

By PATRICK MCGEEHAN and ANITA RAGHAVAN Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

NEW YORK -- Saddled with huge trading losses and a dearth of stock and bond deals, Wall Street securities firms are poised to post their worst quarterly results since the fourth quarter of 1994.

And that prospect already has some major firms, including Merrill Lynch & Co., the nation's biggest brokerage firm, and Travelers Group Inc.'s Salomon Smith Barney unit considering layoffs.

"The swiftness and amplitude of the decline has really put the industry on notice," said Dean Eberling, an analyst at Putnam, Lovell, de Guardiola & Thornton, a New York investment-banking boutique. "This is the wake-up call to remind people that ... this business is cyclical."

Added Ed Orchant, an employment consultant with A-L Associates: "People are starting to worry for the first time in a long time about their jobs."

Merrill Lynch is expected to announce the elimination of at least 500 jobs, mainly in its investment-banking and trading operations, people familiar with those businesses said. A Merrill Lynch spokesman last week said that "no final decisions have been made regarding layoffs anywhere in the firm."

Salomon Smith Barney is also expected to trim its payroll by hundreds of workers, cutting at least 5% of its employees in some departments, particularly in its capital-markets and trading businesses which have been hardest hit by the sell-off in global stock and bond markets, say people at Salomon Smith Barney.

Salomon Smith Barney Outlook

These people declined to specify the actual number of job losses. They did say, however, that the cutbacks wouldn't be anywhere near 5% of Salomon Smith Barney's total work force of 35,000. That's because
Salomon's 10,600 brokers and its technology support staff are likely to be spared from any cost-cutting moves. Salomon employs about 4,500 people in stock-and-bond capital markets and investment banking, and this is where the cuts will be concentrated.

A Salomon spokesman declined to confirm the layoffs.

Wall Street's rush to retrench comes as the nation's brokerage firms are expected to post their worst showing since the fourth quarter of 1994 when they reported an after-tax loss of $136 million. Ever since mid-1995, the securities industry's quarterly after-tax profit has consistently topped $1 billion, reaching a record $2.3 billion in
the second quarter of 1998.

By contrast, while analysts say it is unclear if the third quarter will result in a loss for the industry, a sharp drop in profits is inevitable. "By some measures, this will be the worst quarter that we have seen in the 1990s," said Sallie Krawcheck, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.

Poor Showing in 1994

Ms. Krawcheck said the securities industry's poor showing in 1994 was heavily skewed by a couple of firms, such as the former Salomon Brothers Inc., which posted large losses. "What is striking about this quarter compared to other quarters is that there will be trading hits sustained by all the major securities firms," she said.

To be sure, some firms such as Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.; Goldman, Sachs & Co.; and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. may have better quarters than their peers because they operate on a fiscal year that ends in November. As a result, these firms enjoyed two reasonably profitable months, June and July, before markets headed sharply lower in August.

Many investment-banking firms, including Merrill, Morgan Stanley, Salomon and Lehman Brothers, have already warned investors of potential profit shortfalls in preannouncements in recent weeks. In anticipation of these earnings shortfalls, many brokerage-industry stocks have fallen sharply from their midsummer peaks. Merrill, for example, is off 51% from its 52-week high. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter is down 45% and PaineWebber Group Inc. is off 38%. Lehman Brothers has fallen a steep 60%.

Slowest Weeks of 1998

The past three weeks were the slowest of the year for investment-banking firms. Just $14.2 billion was raised last week in the capital markets, about a third of the amount raised in a typical week in the first half of 1998, according to Securities Data Co., a Newark, N.J., firm that tracks corporate-finance activity.

"If this keeps up, they will be doing a little of everything at all Wall Street firms," said Mr. Orchant of A-L Associates. "Hiring will be frozen, there will be layoffs and bonuses will be cut." Those cuts may come as a shock to many young investment bankers who weren't around six years ago, the last time there was an across-the-board decline in compensation on Wall Street, Mr. Orchant says.

Until the end of August, Wall Street executives were looking to offset falling revenue by paring "discretionary" expenses, Mr. Eberling said. "The last three weeks has intensified the effort to cut costs," he said. "Increasingly, the focus has shifted more toward looking at businesses and making judgments about whether to be in them or get out."

And as Wall Street exits businesses, analysts say the bankers and traders who inevitably will lose their jobs won't have as easy a time getting relocated. "I don't think you will see the rapid absorption of professionals that we have seen over the last four years," said Joan Zimmerman, an executive recruiter at New York-based GZ Stephens Inc. The reason? "You are looking at managements that are much more cautious," she said.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (429)9/22/1998 1:41:00 PM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1151
 
Wall Street Journal - 09/22/98

NEW YORK -- Dow Jones & Co. is removing Malaysia from the Dow Jones World Stock Index, effective Oct. 1, in light of the country's decision to stop trading of its currency outside its own borders.

The capital controls eliminated Malaysia as a viable option for foreign investors. Dow Jones, which publishes the Dow Jones Global Indexes in addition to The Wall Street Journal, will continue to calculate the Malaysia stock index, but won't display it in the Dow Jones Global Indexes table. The index will move to the Stock Market Indexes table that appears within the foreign-markets listings.

Malaysia will return to the Dow Jones World Stock Index when it is again an option for investors, Dow Jones said.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (429)9/22/1998 1:49:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Electronic Telegraph, UK

By Hugo Gurdon in Washington

Republican hopefuls pitch for the moral high ground ... Opponents clash over release of grand jury testimony.

PUBLIC support for President Clinton appeared to be collapsing yesterday as America prepared for today's broadcast of a potentially devastating video of his alleged perjury.

Surveys show big increases in the proportion of voters who think the President should resign or be impeached. The tide of opinion may run even faster after Americans today see more than four hours of Mr Clinton's testimony to a grand jury in the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

A Fox News poll found that 47 per cent of the public now think Mr Clinton should resign or be impeached, twice as many as favour a reprimand or letting him off without punishment. Newsweek magazine found 46 per cent wanting Mr Clinton to resign. This is up from 39 per cent a week ago and 31 per cent last month. Half the public still opposes resignation, but that is down from two thirds last month.

One of Mr Clinton's former close aides, George Stephanopoulos, said: "All the facts finally settled in on people. By the end of the week . . . the President was standing on quicksand."

Sources inside the White House say talk of resignation is spreading in the executive mansion. Although Mr Clinton has said he will "never" quit, and that remains his official line, one official said he would go soon after Jan 20, the date after which his full pension of $150,000 (œ100,000) a year becomes secure. After that date, too, Vice-President Al Gore could take over and still be allowed two full terms in his own right in addition to the rump of Mr Clinton's second term.

The haemorrhaging of support for Mr Clinton will continue today, some analysts believe, because the President reportedly looks shifty, evasive and unpresidential in the video. Bill Kristol, former chief of staff to Vice-President Dan Quayle, said viewers would see that "it's not the sex, stupid, it's the perjury".

It has emerged, according to one leak, that Mr Clinton debates the meaning of the phrase "the whole truth" in his oath before giving testimony, and also that he walks out in fury at one point because his cross-examiners grill him about the exact nature of his sexual contact with Miss Lewinsky, a junior White House employee. Later, after protracted wrangling with prosecutors, a member of the grand jury butts in and asks: "Why aren't you answering the questions?"

In his testimony, Mr Clinton portrayed himself as a friend who, after their sexual contact ended, tried to find Miss Lewinsky a new job and to help her avoid having to testify in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit. But the President said he took these actions out of concern for her and not because he was trying to silence her.

Mr Clinton also answered questions about Kathleen Willey, the woman who has accused him of an unwanted sexual advance, acknowledging it was possible that he tried to reach her as early as the autumn of 1992 at a hotel in Williamsburg, Virginia, during a presidential debate. Prosecutors confronted him with a record of two calls he made to Mrs Willey's room around that time.

As for the alleged advance in the White House in 1993, Mr Clinton gave an identical answer to the one he gave in the Jones lawsuit, denying anything improper happened except that he may have hugged her or kissed her forehead to comfort her.

The decision to release the video has sparked a political storm, with White House supporters accusing Mr Clinton's Republican opponents of rushing out the evidence solely to humiliate the President and make it easier to bundle him out of the Oval Office.

Congressman Barney Frank, a Left-wing Democrat and fierce supporter of the President, said the House of Representatives' judiciary committee, which is responsible for the release of the video and 2,800 pages of other evidence, said: "All we have done so far is be a transmission belt for Ken Starr's accusations, which is one-sided."

Although the public would see Mr Clinton, "one of the most articulate men ever to occupy the office, harrumphing and looking confused because he knows he has done something wrong", it was natural that he would seek to keep as much as possible secret about his illicit sexual affair, Mr Frank said.

Critics, however, accuse the President of "manufacturing after-the-fact explanations of his sexual relations" and lying under oath. They say there has already been eight months of concealment and deception by the White House and it is time for the public to see the evidence and judge for themselves.

Even though today's evidence is mountainous - eight times the length of the Starr report 10 days ago - it is still less than a tenth of what remains. Today's release is from just one of the 17 boxes of Starr report documents, and the judiciary committee has yet to decide about editing and releasing the remaining 16. That could come next week.

According to what appear to be White House leaks, Mr Clinton at one point in the video says to the grand jurors: "I'd give anything in the world not to admit what I had to testify to today." He later accuses prosecutors of making "this the most important issue in America". At another point the President, who is said to have used a cigar as a sex toy in one encounter with Miss Lewinsky, describes sex as "the most mysterious area of human life".