Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (4624)	9/22/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: j_b	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<The judge would enlighten them. The defense attorneys would as well. >> And the jury would still think Clinton had lied, even to the Grand Jury. No one I have spoken with believes him when he says he didn't believe oral sex was sex. They don't believe him when he says that Monica's testimony was okay because the term "sex" hadn't been defined yet, so it could mean anything she wanted it to. They don't believe him when he says that "caused" means "forced", etc. It doesn't matter what the judge thinks (excluding summary judgement, of course), it matters what the people think. They think he lied. Since the basis for the GJ inquiry was the truthfulness of Clinton's testimony and obstruction of justice, lying to the GJ would be material, and would constitute perjury.