Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IRA MONAS who wrote (24064)	9/22/1998 12:52:00 PM
From: JOEY	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

<<<<<<you werent bitching when you were making a killing!!!! its funny how you praised my efforts publicly months ago bottom line .48 to .07 since i left not my problem if assets disappear!!! >>>>>>>>>>> Ira: This is my opinion only, maybe others will agree. Yes the stock did go to .48 under your leadership. But the pretenses WHY the stock went to that level are now being found to be FALSE. How can you blow your horn about the good job you did when it was all under false promotion. I did not invest in FAMH last year to see a short term run up. I invested in this company because of the future prospects being TAUTED by the President. .1085 EPS, New Contracts, Workmans Comp, expansion, Mort, and sooooo many more. I can not believe you do not understand this. You seem proud of the fact that you ran the price up. I find this to be very sad. Joey

To: IRA MONAS who wrote (24064)	9/22/1998 2:17:00 PM
From: Leroyt	Respond to of 27968

Ira, If (and probably WHEN) the 1997 earnings are completed and the results aren't anywhere close to 0.1058 (as you claimed) I think then we can carry on this conversation. I will admit I made $$ off of your promotion but I can't say that makes me feel any better about what appears to be a rather BOGUS performance. If the PR statements that you put out about earnings for FAMH are NOT ACCURATE, the SEC should pursue this matter, IMHO. later, please

To: IRA MONAS who wrote (24064)	9/22/1998 5:26:00 PM
From: Lurker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

<<you werent bitching when you were making a killing!!!! its funny how you praised my efforts publicly months ago bottom line .48 to .07 since i left>> For every person who sold when the price went up, someone else bought those shares and they now have a loss. And now you brag about sticking those people with losses (from .48 to .07). Are you just stupid, or are you really that cruel? Lurker (Like President Clinton, you lack any shred of character.)