Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (4630)	9/22/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

From your post... "How much you know about local law before you begin is most unimportant." I reiterate my assertion that any lawyer that doesn't consider his/her lack of specialization or even a rudimentary knowledge of relevant laws is a malpractice suit waiting to happen. It's amazing to me that a lawyer would advocate such a position. As far as my attention to the details the current Clinton controversy, yes, I actually consider it my civic duty to be informed about this. I took the time to go to my local bookstore and pony up the $10 for the Starr Report and the Presidential Response. I also took the time to watch Clinton's grand jury testimony in it's entirety. I guess we have differing views as to what makes for productive discourse about matters concerning the direction of the OIC investigation and it's ultimate outcome. You are apparently content to voice opinions and conform events to your particular preconceived notions and bias without researching the relevant facts. I've argued my position after reading and viewing the pertinent evidence. Reasonable people can arrive at different conclusions, but I have at least taken the time and expense to educate myself on the facts. You seem to have a problem with that. bp