To: Steve Fancy who wrote (8406 ) 9/22/1998 2:27:00 PM From: DMaA Respond to of 22640
World politicians seem to be stirring into action. Not sure if that is good. Tony Blair calls for complete overhaul of IMF.The Wall Street Journal Interactive Edition -- September 22, 1998 Tony Blair Calls for IMF Reform To Ease Global Financial Crisis By MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL WASHINGTON -- With the Asian crisis spreading around the globe, British Prime Minster Tony Blair added his voice Monday to the chorus demanding that some limits be placed on the freewheeling nature of 1990s global capitalism. Speaking at the very heart of the world financial system -- the New York Stock Exchange -- Mr. Blair called for a one-year multilateral effort to reform the global financial system to prevent the kind of currency crisis that has swept through Asia and Russia and is threatening to absorb Brazil. "The current crisis illustrates the weaknesses of the existing international financial system," Mr. Blair said. "It needs to be modernized to meet the challenges of a new century." His comments added to the growing consensus that something must be done to insulate developing nations from financial volatility, the dark side of the international-capital flows that have flooded emerging markets the past decade. In a speech at New York University Monday, President Clinton concurred: "The most urgent thing we can do is to find a way to keep capital flowing freely so that the market system works around the world, but do it in a way that prevents these catastrophic developments." Cross-border financial flows have been encouraged by the International Monetary Fund, the U.S. and other major industrialized nations, which have urged developing countries to open their borders to foreign investors. Developing nations have considered the inflows a welcome way to jump-start growth and create jobs. However, the nations feel differently about sudden capital outflows, such as those that appeared since the devaluation of the Thai baht and signaled the start of the Asia crisis last July. Increasingly, that skeptical view is being shared -- at least to some degree -- by policy makers in the U.S., the U.K. and many other nations, which are reconsidering the wisdom of the rapid liberalization of capital movements. "The gung-ho world capitalism which was evolving will no longer be the order of the day," predicted Columbia University economist Jagdish Bhagwati. Extreme financial instability surfaced briefly during the Mexican peso crisis of 1994-95. That turmoil subsided quickly, and efforts to reform the global-financial system lost momentum. But the Asian crisis has brought them back to the forefront. The IMF released data Monday showing that net-private-capital flows to emerging markets fell to $173.7 billion in 1997 from $240.8 billion a year earlier -- a 28% drop that seems likely to have worsened this year. Net-private-capital flows to Asia measured just $13.9 billion in 1997, an 87% plunge from the $110.4 billion that poured into the region in 1996. Commercial lenders and portfolio investors actually took $44 billion more out of Asia last year than they put in. Policy makers such as U.S. Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin have long argued that emerging-market governments must adopt sound fiscal, monetary and regulatory reforms, the kind of policies that attract foreign investors. But this group also is seeking ways to protect developing nations from the capital flight that occurs when investors fear that if they sit tight, they will lose their money to a collapsing currency or other economic disaster. Even countries with relatively healthy economic policies can find themselves the victims of a panicky outflow of capital. "I do think it's quite possible that substantial changes need to be made" to the financial system, Mr. Rubin said in an interview Monday. The problem is that nobody has a clear idea of what changes are necessary or how to implement them. "It's very easy to throw ideas out on the table, and it's an important thing to do," Mr. Rubin said. "But the key is then to analyze them with the seriousness that will enable judgments to be made about all the possible ramifications and how this might work. And I don't think that any of this is perfectly understood." Mr. Rubin said economists have learned an enormous amount during the course of the Asian crisis. A group of 22 developing and industrialized nations has been preparing reports on several areas of global-financial reform, including how to ensure that international bailouts, such as those in place for many Asian countries, don't simply rescue Western investors while imposing severe economic hardship on the populace of poor countries. The 22 nations will meet in Washington on Oct. 5 to discuss its findings. In the meantime, academics and policy makers alike are tossing out suggestions. "We should not be afraid to think radically and fundamentally," Mr. Blair said. He identified five steps: Encouraging countries to be more open with economic information, allowing foreign investors to make a more-reasoned estimate of the risks. Insisting that the IMF and World Bank devote more energy to bank supervision and regulation in developing nations. Ensuring that the IMF has sufficient funds to help deserving nations -- at least those that adhere to sound policies -- survive when global financial panic leaves them strapped. Demanding greater openness and accountability by the international financial institutions themselves. Reconsidering policies that urge emerging markets to adopt a rapid and full liberalization of capital accounts. "The recent sharp movements in global capital flows have provided a stark demonstration that while open capital markets do bring in substantial benefits, they also pose serious challenges," Mr. Blair said.