Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: uu who wrote (15214)	9/22/1998 9:09:00 PM
From: E. Graphs	Respond to of 25814

[OT] Clinton..............I feel none of your pain. Addi, You're making me sick, Addi. Please stop the off-topic of your Clinton defense on the LSI thread. It has been an island away from the BS up until now. I think Clinton is low as a snake. Regards, E. Graphs

To: uu who wrote (15214)	9/22/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: Michael F. Donadio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

THANKS ADDI You gave me the website I've been searching for!! I've passed it on. I agree with your technological knowledge as well as your social perspectives. Thanks again, Michael

To: uu who wrote (15214)	9/22/1998 9:35:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 25814

* OT * Addi, I fully agree with you! (Is this the first time we agreed on anything? :-) ) Regarding Henry "The Hypocrite" Hyde, somebody came up with this interesting suggestion -- how about asking him to take an oath, and then, under oath, he should tell us whether or not he had any more affairs after his "youthful indiscretion" was over! :-) I don't think you should hate all Republicans, though I admit that an overwhelming number of them "qualify" for that. There are not many Republicans that won't make me feel like throwing up, but there are also some rare exceptions (so rare that I think they should apply for "Endangered Species" status :-) ) Like Tom Campbell in the Bay Area -- one almost wishes that he was a Democrat... Dipy.

To: uu who wrote (15214)	9/23/1998 2:06:00 AM
From: S. maltophilia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25814

*****OT***** Thanks for the site, Addi. I agree it's time to move on. Remember, folks, it's not about sex; it's about perjury. Just like that paragraph above the signature on Form 1040 and God only knows how many other forms. I would hate to be summoned to the Starr Chamber and made to swear that I've never fudged my taxes. And an argument could be made that it partakes of treason to subvert one's country's financial well being by underpaying one's taxes, which seems to me to be at least as serious as some illicit sex.

To: uu who wrote (15214)	9/23/1998 12:39:00 PM
From: patrick tang	Respond to of 25814

The ones that should be impeached are the American people for letting this whole 'system' continue as is. All these sexual harrasement, dead-beat dads, men as abusers stuff is nothing more than witch-hunts to beat down on the men. The left started it and now the right are using same disgusting tools and tactics. As one lady puts it on a conservative talk show "I am very religious. But I will say this, if I have $40M to dig with, I bet you I can get anybody and everybody to 'perjure'". I call this the death of the American character over the last 30 years. As for Clinton, I've never been a fan of his. I do not condone what he did. But I do not think he should be impeached. But he SHOULD be booed out of office only by citizens who have spotless backgrounds. Now do I hear a roar or a hiss? patrick