Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton Survey "Resign" Yes or NO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve who wrote (444)	9/22/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: dave g	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 697

Steve you seem very confused.. You called Clinton a pervert and you aren't concerned about the sexual aspects of this. So is he a pervert because he committed perjury? Ok, Now I get what you mean. NOT!! Frankly I don't care that he lied to us about his sex life because it was none of our business. I watched all four hours of the tape and yes he was lying by human definition but not by legal definition. They will never prove perjury or witness tampering. He was defiant and I love it. The Anti-Clintonites have been after this guy since day one. I know because some of my best friends are right wingers. Kenn Starr is a right wing crony. The right has had $40 million to get him on something real like campaign finance, China, Missiles or Whitewater. It is obvious that they have failed or they wouldn't have released this last ditch attempt to get Clinton. If any of the other things were true I'd be calling for resignation or impeachment. Starr is either incompetent or there is nothing really there but false accusations and innuendo. Regarding nose piercing and led around. Know one leads me around with or without nose ring. Also, I think that you are terribly naive if you think that any politician is truthful. All leaders lie regularly. The only issue is how good they are at it. They have to in order to get things done. Anyone that knows politics will tell you that. Personally I think we should shitcan all politicians and vote for everything directly over the Internet. Then we could argue about issues and not people. I guess that would take rewriting the constitution though and that won't be happening anytime soon. The best we can hope for is a constitutional convention to change the way campaign financing is done.