Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (4814)	9/22/1998 11:01:00 PM
From: dougjn	Respond to of 67261

Nope, the only really good evidence is of very misleading testimony in the civil deposition. That at best for Clinton comes very close to stepping over the line, but even if it does, is saved by its immateriality. Due to the Lewinsky line of questioning being throw out, and properly ruled not material. At reasonable worse, Clinton tried to avoid perjury, but failed. It was also a very marginally material line of questioning, that would likely have had no effect on the outcome of the case. Even if it hadn't been dismissed for failure to state a plausible case for damages. With the underlying subject being consensual sex, and very remotve from misuse of his powers of office. Doug