Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (6741)	9/23/1998 3:00:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 13994

"A fork in the road: Bubba's fate and ours" by Mona Charen jewishworldreview.com Excellent column. She hits the important "weightier" points. She sure is pretty, too. Some excerpts: "Aristotle spoke of the "habits of virtue" because he understood that the mere repetition of immoral acts corrupts the soul. It is no different with an electorate. If the president performs his functions day to day, most people will very rapidly forget what all the fuss was about. In fact, it is virtually certain that if President Clinton is not removed from office, personal morality (all of it) will be deemed irrelevant to presidential fitness." "The decision by the Republican majority to release President Clinton's videotaped testimony before the grand jury has been decried by Democrats as nothing more than an attempt to shame and humiliate Clinton. Not exactly. It is clearly impossible to shame this president. Any normal man would have resigned long ago rather than face the humiliation of the Starr Report. No, the hope is not that President Clinton will be shamed but rather that the inertial electorate will finally bestir itself and shake him off. Members of Congress who know their duty but continue to shoot nervous glances at opinion polls hope that videotape is mightier than the printed word. "If the process of impeachment is thwarted, by a deal or by anything short of resignation, the principle that presidents may with impunity hold the electorate and the law in contempt will be established. Are the 56 percent of Americans who want Clinton to serve out his term unmindful of the precedential effect? What will the next "private" sin be? Do we want perjurers, extortionists and thieves to believe the electorate doesn't care about character? Republicans and the press are united, for once, in believing this man to be unworthy. That alone ought to make the voters take notice." -------

To: greenspirit who wrote (6741)	9/23/1998 3:24:00 AM
From: jbe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13994

PIG VS. PRIG -- A right-on-target piece in today's (Wednesday's) New York Times explaining Why the Naughty Public Prefers the Pig to the Prigs. (Italics are mine.) JOURNAL / By FRANK RICH Pig vs. Prig It's not only our President who has a certain genius for, as the Starr report puts it, refusing to achieve "completion" in sex. Look at the media. From the moment the All Monica bell went off in January -- with Sam Donaldson's immortal prediction that "If he's not telling the truth,I think his Presidency is numbered in days" -- the press has been promising a national orgasm in the form of the resignation, impeachment or tarring-and-feathering of Bill Clinton. But, in the eternal Groundhog Day that is Monicagate, the consummation, however devoutly wished, never arrives. The teasingly orgiastic buildup is always the same. The Paula Jones case document dump, the Kathleen Willey "60 Minutes" interview, the Aug. 17 Presidential "apology," the Starr report, and now the televised grand jury inquisition were all hyped like the Super Bowl -- only to come and go, leaving the essential civic equation unchanged. Most Americans suspected early on that the President had had sex with Monica Lewinsky and most long ago concluded he lied about it,under oath and not. And yet two-thirds of the country doesn't want him to leave office. Why? It's certainly not that anyone loves Bill Clinton or believes he's capable of honesty. His personal approval numbers are in the toilet. Nor is his Presidency more than an empty shell, even for those who agree with his politics; an unfocused lame duck before the Lewinsky story broke, he has been stripped of the moral and political authority to accomplish anything, at least in the domestic arena, in what months he has left. Looking for a theory to explain a self-stained and humiliated President's illogical hammerlock on his office, the Clinton lynch mob, talking heads and politicians alike, blames the public. The American people, we're repeatedly told, are whores who will not only sell out their principles to the Dow Jones average (never mind its recent decline) but who may have abandoned moral judgments entirely (if we are to believe William Bennett's new screed, "The Death of Outrage"). Last week an exasperated James Dobson, head of the G.O.P.'s powerful family-values auxiliary, Focus on the Family, went so far as to declare "that our greatest problem is not in the Oval Office -- it is with the people of this land." But the people of this land whom he sees as the "problem" are also, as it happens, an American majority that sees people like Mr. Dobson as the problem: preacher-politicians who want to legislate the most intimate acts of human life -- sex and religion. And Kenneth Starr, by his own actions, not those of his political foes, has signaled that he is one of those politicians -- by speaking under Pat Robertson's auspices while serving as Independent Counsel, by dropping all the other Clinton scandals to fixate on Monica, and finally by producing both a report and a grand jury interrogation that chill the rest of us not so much with their salacious detail as with their vision of what America might be like if the Starrs, Robertsons and Dobsons were in power beyond this one investigation. Americans sense that the government prosecutor who uses his office not merely to catalogue repetitive sex acts but to gratuitously determine if (and how) they reached "completion" is an avatar for the political movement that wishes to revive punitive divorce laws, enforce state sodomy statutes (especially against homosexuals), roll back Roe v. Wade and police libraries, TV, movies and the Internet for smut (unless it's state-sanctioned, like the Starr report). The two-thirds of the people in this land who reject such invasive politics, many of them far more honorable than Bill Clinton, would rather have a piggish President they don't admire, and perhaps actively deplore, in the White House than lend any vindication to the crusade of a zealous prig out of "The Crucible." Monicagate will yield more Super Bowl events -- the tainted Linda Tripp tapes, further bimbo eruptions and perhaps even impeachment hearings in which the mob is treated to the spectacle of Congress interrogating Ms. Lewinsky to nail the President on his sworn lies about his contact with her breasts and genitalia. But Mr. Starr was and is Mr. Clinton's best insurance policy. No matter how many doomsdays the media predict, the only way the public is likely to give the President the boot is if the Independent Counsel abdicates first. THE END