SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (38905)9/23/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: Bipin Prasad  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 53903
 
Skeeter,

Sorry if I misunderstood your post - only if your claim was "mu's %
of total revs DEPENDED more on dram than the aforementioned
companies"


However, what you are missing is that LG and HD are not better off
because they are more diversified than MU. ie, There are 115+ subs
among 5 Jaibols. Since Korean accounting system is different from
US, they could stretch out so thin that they became liabilities. When
time was good, it was great that they were diversified. But when they
can't get any more loans from banks and their short term private loan
rates are 25+%, they don't have choice but closing down unprofitable
subs to save whatever is left. For small fish, short term rate goes
over 40% for over night or for a few days. Some small fish have to use
these private loans for over night or so because you go to jail if you
go bankruptcy unlike in US.

Skeeter, I'm not trying to give you hard time. I couldn't stand that
you see only bear side and you were claiming that MU is most leveraged
among semis without knowing other companies' rev and debts and etc. MU
is very small part of my trading. So it's not even worth spending time
to convince you that MU's loss is not that much compare to other semis.
No, MU is not an healthy company to invest, but it's a great company
to trade. You really have to see both sides to trade successfully.

InSook