Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alan w who wrote (5020)	9/23/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

If Clinton could be shown to have a pattern of true and unambiguous sexual harassment, I would consider that quite serious. I guess its still hard for me to consistently think it should be properly impeachable, but it sure would raise my disgust level against him mightily. I think the evidence for that is very poor. Katheen Willey evidence is very poor; her credibility zilch; her motivation to lie for publication money great; her opportunity given the furor surrounding Clinton great. Paula Jones evidence even of the crude behavior was very poor, leaving aside her failure to show she was damaged by his punishing her at work. Which last of course is why the suit was dismissed. And no, I wouldn't be saying what a rotten liar Monica was, if Tripp had no tapes. I'd be saying big deal, move on. Especially since you can't even prove it. And you can't have read a lot of my posts if you think I'm a left wing zealot. I'm an independent who has voted for both parties. Reagan (the first time) as well as Clinton. Etc, etc. Doug