Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE STARR REPORT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j_b who wrote (1411)	9/23/1998 4:11:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1533

You should also go after any Democrat that committed adultery and accused a similarly situated Republican of hypocrisy. Yes, of course. But what I am saying is that the Democrats, in general, do not show that pattern of behavior, whereas the Republicans do, and overwhelmingly so. Of course, the adultery is not the issue, perjury and obstruction are, so even the Republicans would not be hypocrites as regards their condemnation of the President's actions. Yes, they are. Anybody who claims to be a defender of "moral values" is expected to always tell the truth, regardless of whether they are under oath or not. And clearly, the Republicans have repeatedly lied. To the people. We also disagree here. You are perfectly entitled to feel that adultery is wrong, and that therefore the President's adultery is wrong. You may feel it is not appropriate to hate him for it or to ask for some punishment, but that's a different issue. It is up to his wife to decide what her actions should be, but her feelings should in no way influence yours. Well, even if she had chosen to divorce him, I still would have no opinion as to whether he did right or wrong when he had an affair. Dipy.