SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gnuman who wrote (65348)9/24/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Gene - Re: " Wow, that's a lot larger price disparity between Intel and AMD mobile chips than I suspected!"

That's why Intel makes >$1.2 Billion per quarter in profits.

They don't like to give away CPUs for less than they cost to make.

You may have also concluded why AMD continually loses money - if you paid attention.

Paul



To: gnuman who wrote (65348)9/24/1998 2:33:00 AM
From: stak  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Gene, I've been reading your posts over the past year about how the AMD K6-233 started a slide in processor prices not only for Intel , but also for all cpu makers. The intro of the K6-300 mobile looks as though it could trigger a similar destabilization of the mobile cpu market.

Do you have any comments at this time on the possible effects on earnings (best case and worst case scenario) for Intel over the next 4 qtrs.?

Intel has little in the pipeline regarding new product in the mobile market (only PII-333) to be intro-ed in the first half of 1999. What else besides price drops, do you see Intel doing to fend off AMD?

Is another genie about to leave the lamp?

stak