Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (5097)	9/23/1998 9:25:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

I refer you once again to the post you respond to. You have made no case whatsoever. You have not responded to any of my clear and precise arguments. Clinton's perjury if it becomes established did not touch on evidence that had anything to do with the reason Judge Wright dismissed the Jones suit. In fact Clinton's testimony went to a wholly separate element of the alleged offense. Judge Wright, who has publicly mused about punishing Clinton for contempt if he did indeed commit perjury, has not breathed a word about entering summary judgement as a further result. Nor will she. Since you demand to know, I practiced for a substantial number of years at an unarguably leading NYC law firm, which nearly every practicing attorney in this country has very much heard of, before moving on to work in the financial, investment banking side of Wall Street. My work continues to have a significant legal component, and I work closely with practicing lawyers, and draw on my own legal background, all the time. I also retain an interest. I'm not trying to boast. Why do you keep trying to belittle and demean? Doug