Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (5120)	9/23/1998 9:44:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Respond to of 67261

Seems like you are going through your own dicscovery....OH BTW someone else the other day asked if you ever signed off on your tax return .... do you disclose those tips your hubby throws you...hhaa haahaa hahaha

To: jlallen who wrote (5120)	9/23/1998 9:45:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

You did not answer my question....how are you doing fer onions ???

To: jlallen who wrote (5120)	9/23/1998 9:57:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

You seem to be talking about barn yard justice. <<Do you mean to say you are unaware of a case where a Judge disallowed a defense (even a meritorious one) in a case where a party abused discovery, affirmatively misrepresented facts to the Court, violated the orders of the Court or otherwise did not act with candor?>> If you mean by all that, that a judge is likely to use his/her discretion to rule against the offending party in areas of evidentiary or other discretion, you are right. Certainly it will weigh in the judgement, depending upon the judge. If you mean that such abuses would lead a Federal Judge to rule on the entire case, by issuing a Summary Judgement, reversing a prior dismissal, even though the bad conduct went to areas wholly distinct legally and logically from the reasons the case was dismissed, you are wrong. Or if not wrong, that District Court Judge would be reversed at the Federal Court of Appeals level. Doug