Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (5126)	9/23/1998 11:43:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

OK well Dwight you commented on each of these scenarios in a rational way, which is good, but you didnt comment on your party (or religious right or whatever) platform. If someone I know, or myself, wants to have a child and is single, what should they do? 1) Not have the child 2) Marry anybody (even if they dont even like the person, using the womans money probably to attract this individual) and have the child 3) Have the child when they are single and not involve the father at all 4) Have the child when they are single and passively involve the father And, for each of these scenarios, which is permissable to remain a member of the conservative republicans? The message I have from misc talking heads etc is that only #2 is permissible to the republicans/RR. Heres how I would rank the 4 options: 4,3,1,2. Michelle