Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : HONG KONG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zardoz who wrote (2342)	9/24/1998 8:41:00 AM
From: Ron Bower	Respond to of 2951

Hutch, >"Maybe you want them to fail? And take your your investments with them?"< Yes. They were gambling on high risk speculation and lost. It's the chance one takes. They could have put their money in bonds. I have no sympathy for anyone that gambles on large profits and fails. JMHO, Ron

To: Zardoz who wrote (2342)	9/24/1998 9:35:00 AM
From: Tom	Respond to of 2951

Oh, my. Comments from Hutch. Nice run-up in Hong Kong last night. Ay? I'll bet I made a bundle. "Buy low, sell high" really works. By the way, my friends don't lend. They give. Your perspective, though popular, is an erratum in my world, Hutch.

To: Zardoz who wrote (2342)	9/24/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: Tom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2951

Hutch! It's for you. It's Paul Volcker! "Why should the weight of the federal government be brought to bear to help-out a private investor? It is not a bank. This has implications about public policies." He hung-up. I think he's p*ssed. Don't worry. I've written my rep's in Congress and told them what he said. The nerve...!