Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Cade Industries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ernest K Brandt who wrote (3243)	9/24/1998 9:48:00 AM
From: MechanicalMethod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3563

WSJ mention? Check Wed.'s Wall St. Journal. Unconfirmed. CADE mentioned in article covering insider buying in the Aerospace Industry. If true, please provide date, page and title of article. Folks, it's time to rally. If we get to 3.50 quickly, we need a strong close there. Followed immediately with a nasty 2 day dip to frighten our quitter's into placing sell limit 3.50 orders. They'll be shaken out automatically the next time through. so much for their little basecamp. Bears ravaged our Cade last Q. Our well timed refusals to buy the close can end their reign. Follow it up with well timed buying of the close and we will bevel the rough edges into a nicely feathered, amazingly beautiful chart. Carefully pick the points you place your jack. Chisel the triangles with agility. Place all wedges properly. Shim it skillfully, wherever, whenever and however it requires and Cade is going to go. Management has taken great care to create fundamentals that are good to go. These 21 shopping days until news is our opportunity to rally. A quick touch and go with 1 day closing at 3.50 will have our quitter's saying yeehaa all weekend. That nasty dip will kill their spirits quickly and they'll fall into their chosen destiny as loser's without further prodding. When they're gone we'll eyeball a spot for our flagpole and finesse them back in at the top. osci

To: Ernest K Brandt who wrote (3243)	9/24/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: MechanicalMethod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3563

Ernie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :^))))))))) hi! If you thought my message this morning was impersonal and didn't offer you any thanks for bringing NEWWWWWWWsssssss!!! ,then let me explain. I was putting together some thoughts to post before leaving for work and I caught your message at the last minute and used it as the lead story at the top of my post. Only reason it was impersonal was I was sending it everywhere and I should have taken the time to insert my personal feelings into the one that I sent you, I love you man! :^) That is the most awesome news. WSJ thinks enough of cade to mention us in their story. btw, I never doubted the accuracy of your report, I just wanted everyone to know where to look for it and I couldn't give them that. Do you realize that those of us on the net would not of heard of this news without your having brought it to our attention? nobody on the net seemed to know. WSJ subscribers certainly noticed it yesterday and that explains the increased vol. I hope you will tell me about the 3 day rule. I would be guessing, so I won't go there. I'll let you tell me the correct way. Ernie, you are the man! cya, osci