SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (1184)9/24/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Kirk ©  Respond to of 15132
 
Bob said he rated the Bay Area as tops in the world to live....
It is a bit expensive. 8)

This article biz.yahoo.com
is about one of the nice neighborhoods to live. There are many others at about the same price level. I've seen 50% price appreciation in my home since I bought 4 yrs ago in another nice place to live... Just heard a jobs outlook for the Silicon Valley and housing will be really tight in 10 yrs. These high end neighborhoods will continue to beat the market by my estimate.

more than one way to skin a cat or make a buck...
regards
Kirk out
suite101.com



To: Justa Werkenstiff who wrote (1184)9/27/1998 8:34:00 PM
From: Justa Werkenstiff  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 15132
 
** Saturday Full Length Summary **

FLASH: BRINKER IS THE MOST BULLISH I HAVE HEARD HIM AT ANYTIME THIS YEAR.

We have now had three consecutive up weeks in the stock market. We
have now put in the bottom in this correction DOW 7537, 957 S & P,
around 1500 NASSDAQ. Dow was up 1.7% at 8028, S & P 500 up 2.4% up
to 1045 and NASDAQ up 4.8%. NYSE: 2084 gainers and 1374 losers. New
highs 131 over 32 the prior week. New highs up about 300%. New lows
contracting from 522 to 460. Bond market strong.

We are now in a position, albeit additional probing and testing,
backing and filling could occur, "at any time within the next few
weeks to launch a rally" that carry the markets to all time record
heights.

Everything that could possibly go right down the road has the
potential to go right down the road. We cannot control Russia,
Japan, Asia and Latin America. Part of the reason for the
intermediate correction is because of what was going on
internationally.

And in fact, the market had a golden excuse to collapse and refused
to do so: Long Term Capital Management. But the market closed to
about where it was before the problem was made public at DOW 8000. Brinker later stated in the show that as far a hedge fund or financial failures go, this one has to be rated as one of the all time greatest. My note: So the fact that the market survived this debacle so far is a very positive sign.

LTC was short Treasuries and long junk bonds including emerging
market bonds. Brinker said LTC bet that interest rates were going
up in an inflationary environment here in the US. Wrong. With dead pan humor, Brinker could not for the life of him understand why the smarties in Greenwich did not listen to MoneyTalk because he had been bullish on bonds and told listeners to steer clear from junkies.

Change of Brinker position. Previously, he stated that new highs
would be made by next summer or within about a one year time frame.
He now sees new highs within six to twelve months. (Why Brinker does not announce changes in his thinking by first reviewing previously held market views is beyond me).

Prefers SPY over MDY for better chance for full rally
participation.

How bullish is Brinker? Let me count the ways:

1. "These are the buying opportunities that come along only on pretty
rare occasions."

2. "As midterm, off presidential bottoms go, this is going to rank as
one of the best ever. All of my market timing model indicators at
this time are flashing outright buy signals."

3. On a scale of 1 to 10, the market is acting like a 10 from its
lows.

4. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being he most bullish, Brinker is at
a 10.

5. The market is more attractive now than at anytime in 1998.

6. Brinker stated that this is one of the most exciting times to be in the stock market. Brinker believes we are about to embark on a rally that will exceed 20% off those lows and it may "exceed 20% by a substantial margin."

7. Brinker trashed the bears on several occasions without taking names. This is the new Brinker Confidence Indicator <GG> in my mind as we saw rare bear bashing in the prior three weeks since the correction exceeded the original benchmarks.

The probabilities highly favor a rate cut by the Fed. Historically,
that has been a very favorable underpinning to the market. What the
market does the day of the cut does not matter. It may have been

The only question remaining in Brinker's mind is how much Greenspan
will cut the federal funds rate. The market has already discounted
a .5% move. Brinker noted that Greenspan has a reputation as a
gradulaist. (My note: Greenspan has a penchant for moving in .25%
increments). If Greenspan moves .25%, Brinker surmises that there
are no more cockroaches behind the baseboard in the form of LTC. I
------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenspan goes .50%, Brinker surmises that he may well have
knowledge that there are other hedge funds with similar problems
that are unknown to the investing public at this time.

In the absence of recession, it is certainly untrue that corporate
earnings are one of the most important things in terms of the
market outlook. For example, in the absence of recession if you
have a flattish outlook for corporate profits but you had an
outlook for lower interest and lower inflation, that could justify
higher price-earnings ratios. Higher price-earnings ratios would
mean higher stock prices so long as earnings were in a flattish
area.

Brinker sees price-earnings ratio expansion in the next six to
twelve months and even though earnings might not go up a whole lot,
he thinks the price earnings ratio expansion can get us to new
highs in the markets.

The idea that earnings are the biggest driver for stock market
performance is total nonsense. Suppose you had rising higher
corporate earnings were caused by an economy that was growing too
fast and, therefore, producing higher inflationary expectations and
higher interest rates, the stock market would not go up.

The market has a glass ceiling of between 23 and 24.5x earnings. We
got to 25x trailing earnings this summer.

Charts will show you resistance and support has been but have no
predicitive value.

You guys all owe me lunch <GGG>.