SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton -- doomed & wagging, Japan collapses, Y2K bug, etc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 12:56:00 PM
From: SOROS  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1151
 
Dear Joe,

In answer to your questions:

YES
NO
SOME
MOST
SOME (always have)
BEST I CAN
SOME OF US ARE LUCKY TO HAVE THIS OPTION

I remain,

SOROS

ps read on, and perhaps you, too, will make some "hysterical" posts



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 12:57:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Associated Press - 09/24/98

MOSCOW (AP) -- Alexander Lebed, one of Russia's most influential politicians, called today for the resignation of President Boris
Yeltsin and his entire Cabinet.

Lebed, the governor of the vast Krasnoyarsk region, has long been critical of Yeltsin. But he has voiced support recently for the new
prime minister, Yevgeny Primakov, who is still assembling a Cabinet.

During a just-concluded visit to France, Lebed said, he was told by French business leaders that Russia ''would not get a single
dollar'' so long as Yeltsin remains in power, the Interfax news agency reported.

A likely presidential candidate himself, Lebed said the entire government should be replaced with a group that can be trusted and
doesn't have ''the previous frauds,'' Interfax said.

Lebed, a former general who once served as Yeltsin's national security chief, also said former Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin
has little chance at winning the next presidential election in 2000.

Chernomyrdin, who twice failed to win approval from Russia's parliament as Russia's prime minister in a government shakeup last
month, is not seen as popular among ordinary Russians.

''After the fiasco Chernomyrdin suffered in the Duma, one can hardly expect a success,'' Lebed said, according to the ITAR-Tass
news agency. ''He will not become president.''

Lebed still refuses to say whether he plans to run in the 2000 election.



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 12:58:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Washington Post - 09/24/98

By Steven Mufson and John M. Berry

A huge private investment fund run by Wall Street legend John Meriwether and two Nobel Prize-winning economists teetered on the
verge of collapse yesterday as losses mounted on more than $100 billion of bets it made in financial markets around the world.

In an attempt to avoid a new bout of global market turmoil that might be caused by a fire sale of the fund's assets, chief executives
and other top officials from two dozen of the world's largest banks and brokerage firms spent six hours hammering out a preliminary
agreement yesterday at the New York Federal Reserve Bank to provide a rescue plan of more than $3.5 billion for the Greenwich,
Conn.-based fund, called Long-Term Capital Management L.P.

The money is not a bailout of the firm's investors but rather a takeover of the firm by its creditors, who are attempting to buy time so
they can recover some of its losses.

The negotiations at the New York Fed underscored the seriousness with which regulators regard the turmoil surrounding Long-Term
Capital. The fund, like many similar "hedge funds" on Wall Street, used a complex, computer-based strategy to invest in bonds and
currencies from around the globe -- and officials fear that its demise could reverberate well beyond the narrow confines of Wall
Street. Traders said banks already are tightening credit in response to the crisis, a credit crunch that eventually could affect loans to
individuals and small businesses.

The high-level negotiations are likely to cast further attention on the largely unregulated business of hedge funds, which use
borrowed money to wager on the direction of financial markets. Their web of international transactions has played a key role in
linking financial crises in one part of the globe to seemingly unrelated markets elsewhere.

A source close to the negotiations described hedge funds as "the connectors of the global economy." The leaders of many
developing countries, such as Malaysia, have placed the blame for a regional economic collapse at the feet of hedge fund
managers.

Long-Term Capital has trading contracts based on securities worth nearly $1 trillion, an investment banker close to the talks
estimated, and its agreements involve institutions scattered all over the world. The fund's arcane series of transactions linked its
fortunes to securities ranging from Russian treasury bonds to Danish mortgages, from the British pound's value against the U.S.
dollar to the volatility of the American stock exchanges.

In a statement last night, Long-Term Capital said it believed the infusion of new funds would provide enough breathing room for the
company to manage its investments -- and if the markets cooperate, recover some of its losses. The deal came with a price,
however. The consortium of banks lending the money will now own 90 percent of the firm and appoint an oversight committee that
will direct its overall strategy and make sure it reduces its exposure to markets.

The committee will consist of representatives from Goldman Sachs & Co., Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley Dean Witter,
Travelers Group Inc. and UBS Securities Inc. -- firms with some of the largest exposures to Long-Term Capital's troubles.

Long-Term Capital had an enviable track record before this year, but a series of miscalculations combined with unusual international
economic upheavals have hammered the fund's performance. Earlier this month, Long-Term Capital said it had lost $2.5 billion, or 52
percent of its net assets, in trading so far this year, most of it in less than two months -- and the losses are said to have climbed
even further this month.

The fund's swift decline was propelled in part by its strategy of borrowing heavily to finance large market bets. The heavy borrowing,
or high leverage, meant that once the fund suffered losses, it was forced to sell some of its other holdings to meet margin calls from
creditors concerned that the fund's collateral was no longer sufficient to meet minimum loan requirements. Being forced to sell while
markets were in turmoil only compounded the fund's losses -- and added to turmoil both in emerging markets and in the United
States, where it was easier to unload investments such as Treasury bonds.

"When positions move away from them, the value of the collateral shrinks and so they owe more collateral. To get the collateral,
they have to sell something else," said one source.

Long-Term Capital's troubles have been compounded by the difficulty of untangling such large positions in a short time. "Once the
Street knows you're a wounded animal or cornered bear, you're not going to get a good price," said Steven Lonsdorf, president of
Van Hedge Fund Advisors.

Hedge fund sources said that in late August, Long-Term Capital asked the Quantum Fund, run by hedge fund titan George Soros,
for an injection of half a billion dollars in new capital, but that Quantum declined.

But the investment firms and banks that did business with Long-Term Capital had more at stake. "The alternative they all have is if
Long-Term goes bankrupt, a lot of banks can lose," said an official of one major bank involved in the talks. The financial institutions
could be vulnerable because of credit lines extended to Long-Term Capital, or because they are on the other side of market bets the
firm placed.

The major banks and investment houses do not want a forced liquidation of Long-Term Capital's positions. Indeed, many are willing
to sit with the positions and wait for them to recover. The banks are trying to avoid fire sales of assets that could pull down prices in
stock, bond and currency markets worldwide, but one source said there may be sales that would cause problems in particular
markets -- such as, say, Danish mortgages -- that are small and illiquid.

"It's easier to close out some positions than others," a source said.

Prior to this year, Long-Term Capital had nearly tripled the money of its investors. Meriwether, formerly the head of bond trading at
Salomon Brothers Inc., teamed up with Nobel laureates Robert C. Merton of Harvard University and Myron S. Scholes of Stanford
University to use mathematical formulas to arbitrage, or take advantage of differences in the values of securities between different
markets.

Long-Term Capital generally borrows money to buy securities, pledging some or all of the value of the securities as collateral for the
loan. Then, Long-Term Capital creates "derivatives" using those securities. Derivatives are financial instruments whose value is tied
to an underlying market index, currency, stock, bond or commodity. As a hedge, they can help companies protect themselves from
unexpected changes in such things as interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations and swings in commodity prices.

But Long-Term Capital used them to place bets that went bad when global markets started to lurch in directions, and magnitudes,
that defied the fund's statistical models.

Market sources said that some of the ways Long-Term Capital lost money included: losses related to the Russian bond market, the
defaulting of ruble currency hedges by Russian banks, an incorrect bet on Danish mortgages and German bonds, a misguided bet
that volatility in the American markets would drop off, and a wrong bet on the value of the British pound against the dollar. Stock and
bond prices that were supposed to converge, diverged instead and liquidity dried up in many markets.

In a Sept. 3 letter to his shareholders, Meriwether said: "We expected that sooner or later . . . we as a firm would be tested. I did
not anticipate, however, how severe the test would be."

The losses struck a blow to the reputation of Meriwether, who gained fame in the 1980s as a bold bond trader. In the book "Liar's
Poker," written by a former Salomon Brothers bond trader, Meriwether was described as being dared by the Salomon chairman to
bet $1 million on a hand of poker using serial numbers on a dollar bill. Meriwether reportedly offered to make the bet $10 million,
prompting the then-Salomon chief to walk off in disbelief.



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 1:00:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
The Telegraph - London - 09/24/1998

AMERICA'S impeachment crisis could have dangerous consequences, inviting fresh trouble at a time when world affairs are already
in acute distress, says the former director of the CIA.

Hostile states such as Iraq were likely to "discount the United States heavily" as a force in the world, says James Woolsey. He
believes paralysis in Washington will prevent the US government from responding to provocations.

In an interview with The Telegraph, Mr Woolsey gave a caustic assessment of the President he served until his abrupt resignation in
January 1995. Dismissing Bill Clinton as a "tactician", he said the foreign policy of the administration was driven by opinion polls,
short-term PR calculations and the spin-cycle rhythm of an election campaign.

"If you want to know how they make decisions, all you need do is watch the War Room," he said, referring to the documentary of Mr
Clinton's 1992 presidential campaign.

During his two years as Director of Central Intelligence, Mr Woolsey managed to secure only two conversations with Mr Clinton.

"It wasn't that I had a bad relationship with him. I just didn't have any relationship," said Mr Woolsey. He believes the damage to the
American national interest has been substantial, though largely hidden from view. Mr Woolsey compared the global scene to the
late 1920s when inchoate foreign threats were ignored, played down, and ultimately allowed to escalate.

He said US policy towards Iraq was "feckless and flaccid". Mr Clinton's midnight bombing of an empty building in Baghdad in 1993
was a "laughable" gesture, an inadequate response to an Iraqi assassination plot against former President Bush.

"We should have hit the instruments of state power," he said. "It was exhibit number one of a paper tiger." Exhibit number two was
the failure to intervene to stop the Erbil massacre in northern Iraq in 1996. Exhibit number three had been the collapse of the UN
weapons inspection regime, blamed by Mr Woolsey on the capricious manouevres of the Russians and the French, as well as the
incompetence of the Clinton administration.

"We've not been willing to take on the biggest bully in the Mid-east playground, and you can't keep giving the bully a free pass."

The danger was growing because Saddam Hussein had wrapped himself in the flag of Islam. Mr Woolsey compared the gambit with
Stalin's tactical exploitation of Christianity during the Second World War. Cementing an alliance with Sunni fundamentalists,
Saddam was successfully invoking the idea of a "new Caliphate". To complicate matters further in the Islamic world, Mr Clinton had
damaged relations with Pakistan by firing missiles at five camps in Afghanistan in an anti-terrorist strike last month. Two of the
camps were training Pakistani guerrillas for operations in Kashmir.

Mr Woolsey said Yevgeny Primakov, Russia's new prime minister, a former KGB boss, was "terrible".

Calling him an antediluvian, "zero-sum" communist, he said Mr Primakov could be expected to "kowtow to the most
unreconstructed elements of the military industrial complex" and would seek to hurt Western interests wherever possible. Mr Clinton
had staked everything on Boris Yeltsin and was now inextricably associated with this grand failure. The risk was that Russia would
turn increasingly nasty and xenophobic.

"I'm troubled by the parallels with the 1930s. I can see Russia playing the role of Weimar Germany," he said, adding that the
Weimar Republic, a democracy under the rule of law, with a viable economy, was in far better shape than Russia today.

"The 1930s were not inevitable, they could have been avoided. But not even Churchill could see what was happening. He was cutting
the Royal Navy budget when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer.

"And here we are now, cutting the devil out of our defence budget. We need to be careful."



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 1:01:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
BBC - London - 09/24/98

South Asia could be the next casualty of the global crisis, the ILO warns

Worldwide unemployment is at record levels, with an estimated 10 million people having lost their jobs because of the Asian
economic crisis, according to the International Labour Organisation's World Employment Report for 1998-1999.

A third of the world's labour force - about one billion workers - remains unemployed or underemployed, according to the report. (The
term "underemployed" refers to people who are working substantially less than full-time despite being willing to work more.)

Of these, about 150 million are actually unemployed, according to the report, which was released on Thursday.

"The first half of 1998 has actually seen economic growth in many parts of the world," ILO Director Michel Hansenne commented.

"However, this revival, which we anticipated would spur higher jobs growth in all parts of the world, has only cut unemployment and
underemployment in the United States, and to a lesser degree in the European Union.

"Stubbornly persisting high levels of unemployment and underemployment lead to social exclusion of the young and the old, the
less skilled, the disabled and ethnic minority groups - with a strong bias against women in all categories," Mr Hansenne added.

The ILO advocates worker training as the single best solution to help vulnerable groups out of the trap of unemployment.

South Asia in danger

The report carries a particular warning for South Asia, which has so far remained relatively unaffected by the economic collapse
which has blighted the rest of the continent over the past year.

It says India and Bangladesh have not reduced the high numbers of people earning less than a living wage, and criticises inadequate
efforts to improve training and education, which it says was the basis for east Asia's economic surge in previous decades.

The report says India and Pakistan have made some progress, but the pace of change - especially in Pakistan - remains far too
slow to make a substantive difference to economic growth.

Russia worse off

People in the former communist countries of eastern and central Europe continue to suffer a dramatic decline in living standards,
accompanied by a rise in the unemployment rate to 9% from virtually zero.

In Russia, for example, wages are worth less than 60% of their real 1989 value, and the report predicts further rises in joblessness
and poverty as a result of the recent economic collapse there.

In Latin America, unemployment has increased since 1991, and now stands at 7.4% - even though the economic growth rate which
reached 5% in 1997, and the hyperinflation that bedevilled certain countries in previous years has been brought into check.

The report warns that more jobs in the region may be lost as investors lose confidence in emerging markets, in the wake of the
Asian collapse.

Africa, after a long period of poor growth and deteriorating labour market conditions, seems to have experienced an improvement in
the employment situation in many places.

The report warns, however, that these signs "should not be cause for undue optimism", with many of the new jobs in the
subsistence and informal sectors, and the increase in the number of jobs not keeping pace with population growth.

The ILO describes the situation in developed countries as "encouraging but uneven", noting a recent upturn in prospects in Europe.

In Japan, employment rates are still high by world standards, but unemployment there has begun to rise sharply.



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 1:01:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
WASHINGTON - Within 24 hours, two former presidents - Jimmy Carter expansively, George Bush most reluctantly - breached
a longstanding custom of the presidency that says once you've occupied the office you don't publicly criticize those who follow.

Neither offered much in the way of aid and comfort to a besieged Bill Clinton, although Bush said he had no desire "to be out there
carping away."

Clinton's fellow Democrat seemed to feel no such reluctance.

In a question-and-answer session with Emory University students in Atlanta, Carter said Clinton had lied under oath. He also
predicted the House would vote to impeach Clinton but the Senate would not "marshal the two-thirds vote that will be required to
remove the president."

Carter added that he had both "deplored and been deeply embarrassed about" Clinton's behavior with Monica Lewinsky.

Bush, 74, who lost re-election to Clinton in 1992, was far more circumspect. Throughout an interview Wednesday on NBC's "Today,"
he said he was reluctant to criticize or second-guess Clinton. "He's got enough critics out there now," Bush said.

Finally, pressed to comment on whether Clinton had "diminished" the office of president, Bush said, "I'm afraid, for now, it has been
diminished." But he quickly added that the office is strong, "bigger than any one person."

Beyond that, he said, he did not want to say what may be "in my heart" out of fear of putting his sons on the spot. Jeb Bush is
running for governor of Florida and George W. Bush is seeking re-election as governor of Texas and may become a candidate for the
GOP presidential nomination in 2000.

Former President Ford, 85, who succeeded Richard Nixon when Nixon resigned in 1974 and who was defeated in 1976 by Carter,
has generally kept his silence about Clinton.

Indeed, last June, six months after the Lewinsky affair first became public, Ford used a Washington speech to criticize House
Speaker Newt Gingrich, a fellow Republican, as excessively partisan.

By comparison with his Republican counterparts, Carter was outspoken in his Atlanta remarks Tuesday night.

Carter, 73, said he did not believe Clinton told the truth either in his deposition for the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit or
during his testimony for the grand jury led by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr.

At the same time, Carter also criticized "the reaction to it, the overemphasis of it, the matter in which a very serious political and
legal issue has been addressed."

Clinton's 1996 opponent, former Sen. Robert Dole, does not have to abide by the rules of the ex-presidents club since he never
made it to the White House. In a radio interview on Tuesday, Dole was asked if Clinton was morally fit for his office. "I think it's a
close call," he replied.

In July, when the Clinton White House was resisting efforts by Starr to get Clinton's Secret Service agents to testify, Bush sided
with Clinton while Carter and Ford said agents should testify in criminal cases.

In his Emory remarks, Carter predicted the presidency and the country would survive this "embarrassing circumstance."

"Nothing fatal has been done," he said. "Our nation is the finest democracy on Earth, and one of the finest aspects of it is that our
problems are, in effect, self-healing, or self-correcting when a mistake is made."



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 1:11:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
IN a sign of deepening political crisis for Bill Clinton, Vice-President Al Gore at the weekend made his first criticism of the President
as a new poll suggested Americans were growing disenchanted with their leader.

As Congress prepared to release tonight a videotape and a mountain of sexually graphic material resulting from the White House
sex-and-lies probe, Mr Gore described his boss's behaviour as "indefensible". His swipe at Mr Clinton on Saturday was the most
significant reflection of growing disillusion among Democrats.

In an interview published in New Hampshire newspaper The Concord Monitor, the Democratic frontrunner for the presidential race in
2000 criticised Mr Clinton's affair with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. He went on to say he felt sympathy for a
"suffering friend" and did not want him to resign.

Mr Gore needed to distance himself from the scandal in Washington to maintain his chances of succeeding Mr Clinton. It was no
coincidence that he did so in New Hampshire, site of crucial primaries in the US's presidential elections.

He also criticised Republicans in Congress for deciding to release Mr Clinton's testimony on the Lewinsky affair just as the
President is due to put on a show of statesmanship overnight as he addresses world leaders at the UN and meets British Prime
Minister Tony Blair for a policy seminar.

Equally damaging was the latest Newsweek survey of 750 adults that said a growing number of Americans think Mr Clinton should
consider resigning and that Congress should start impeachment proceedings. Forty-six per cent say Mr Clinton should consider
resigning, up from 39 per cent one week ago.

About 41 per cent said Congress should open impeachment hearings against 35 per cent last week, and 64 per cent said it should
reprimand or censure Mr Clinton, up from 54 per cent. But a majority - 53 per cent - still said there should be no impeachment
hearings. And 50 per cent said Mr Clinton should not consider resigning. Republicans hope Mr Clinton's approval rating will dive
tomorrow after Congress releases - with only minor editing - the videotape of the President's four-hour grand jury testimony on the
Lewinsky affair and other sexually explicit evidence.

The New York Times quotes lawyers familiar with the case as saying that in his August 17 testimony to independent prosecutor
Kenneth Starr's grand jury, Mr Clinton expressed regret about their affair. "I'd give anything in the world to not admit what I had to
testify to today," the lawyers said Mr Clinton told the jury.

The graphic report by Mr Starr - who is trying to prove Mr Clinton perjured himself when giving testimony on the Lewinsky affair to
the Paula Jones sexual harassment case - is being considered by the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. The
committee, which voted at the weekend to release the video and additional documents, will decide whether Mr Clinton should be
impeached.



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 1:13:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
Russia Today Brief

CHUBAIS PREDICTS WORSE TO COME FOR RUSSIAN ECONOMY

The architect of Russia's privatization program, Anatoly Chubais, announced Wednesday that he believes the situation in Russia is
poised to become worse. Chubais, who lost his deputy prime minister's post in March, remains the head of the Russian power grid,
EES. He told journalists that he fears the new government's policies will lead to what he termed "Soviet madness." Said Chubias,
"You can argue just how deep the retreat will be...But the fact that a retreat will come is inevitable."



To: Tumbleweed who wrote (451)9/24/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: SOROS  Respond to of 1151
 
"World Needs A Global Religion", by Joe Rogaly, written for The Financial Times, distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, and republished by the New Haven Register, January 11, 1998.

"Christianity is a mature enterprise. It has survived for nearly 2,000 years. The question is, will it last out the next century? If it
does not, it could be because it has allowed itself to be broken up into rival institutions. The lesson is clear. It must merge or
bust. The same might be said of all organized religions, including Judaism ... and relative newcomers like Islam."

"... the number of people who say they have no religion has risen sharply during the past quarter-century. Everywhere, it seems,
willingness to attend services is less strong than the natural human desire for faith, certainty, and rules of behavior. We all know
why. The value of formal worship in public buildings is being blasted out of people's minds. The cult of the individualmarches in triumph across the globe, in lock-step behind science and capitalism ... The extended family is disintegrating.People are less likely to live close to one another in coherent sub-tribal groups ... Personal advancement is our drivingmotive. Enterprise, competition, self-reliance are the ruling precepts ... The selfish motive is uppermost. Pirates rule."

"Only a belief in the spiritual self can soften the effect of this counter-human revolution. Alas, the defenders of the spirit are
divided, squabbling among themselves, sulking in their tents ... Lacking cohesion, their strength, once irresistible, is draining
away. In such a situation, any prudent undertaking will try to restructure itself. The great religions must be amalgamated. A
series of takeovers is required. The breakup of Christianity should be reversed. The Church of Rome should join hands withthat of Constantinople. The rest -- Episcopalians, Methodists, Baptists, Seventh Day Adventists -- should be coaxed in."

"True believers in God, the soul, and a hereafter, would be wise to go further. A new planetary religious confederation, the spirit
of ecumenical endeavor, could match the globalization of material wealth-creation. Churches would sit alongside synagogues,
mosques, temples. The great faith systems of China and Japan would meet those originating in the Middle East and India ... we
need ways of rescuing religion ... Our generally shared set of beliefs determines our behavior. Capitalist predators can be good
Christians, Jews, Hindus ... So can politicians, civil servants, the white coats who rule our laboratories. We all need some form
of religion. Without it, we shall be reconstituted as androids."