SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (6661)9/24/1998 1:47:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Respond to of 9980
 
Ultimately stability and reform must come from within. What they are hoping to do, I believe, is stabilize the situation so the reforms can take place.

The example I use is a patient with a very high fever. One treatment is to plunge the patient in an ice bath to bring the fever down. The ice is not a long term cure but can stabilize the situation temporarily so that medication can take effect.



To: DMaA who wrote (6661)9/24/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: Paul Berliner  Respond to of 9980
 
David, Re: the excerpt from the WSJ article attached to your prior post;
I scoffed when I read it, because as usual WSJ is blowing the story out of proportion with its dramatic portrayance of hedge funds. Another note: All this nonsense about LTC'c secretive quant methods is a load of crap. They're no different that anyother hedge fund with the same objectives. All in all, it wasn't any sophisticated quant equiation that did them in, just a simple one that wound up being too good to be true for LTC and countless others.
Math:
Funds buy Russian short term GKOs yielding 150% - 200%, annualized.
Market expectations= G7 debt bailout and possible 15% - 25% Ruble devaluation.
Exepected profit = difference between GKO yield and Ruble's expected new value (plenty of room for profit even if Ruble would be devlaued by 50%).
Un-expectations= G7 ignorance, Russian debt default.
Result= A whole lotta pain.