Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Laser who wrote (1967)	9/24/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: Karl Zetmeir	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

I understand the "small deposit" you allude to (maybe you know something no one else knows??) ... Is faced by a surface area of 12,000 sq. ft. of marble ... not too shabby ... Further, we may be at the tip of the iceberg ... who knows?

To: Laser who wrote (1967)	9/24/1998 3:33:00 PM
From: DavidCG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Laser, it makes a difference to me if the marble quarry has been around there for say 15 years vs. 1 month. The reason (to me at least)... It seems odd if they just found a mineralized pocket of gold in a quarry that has been mined at for a long time. And it means to me that this might just be a lucky pocket of gold. If it is a NEW QUARRY...then that is exciting to me because we're talking about an untapped, virgin area. I don't care what mines are adjacent to this marble quarry... I want to know how long people have been mining marble from this quarry. Because I will dismiss this find if the marble quarry has been around 10 -100 years and no other gold finds documented. However, I might buy MGAU if I find out this marble quarry is only 3 years old. That is where I am at. -DavidCG