SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: matt fahy who wrote (22244)9/24/1998 5:42:00 PM
From: joe  Respond to of 45548
 


Matt,

>>I can't believe this myself yet, but I am 100% OUT (at $30 5/8) of my trading position in COMS, I don't touch my l-t holding very often which I still hold some in. Two days of weakness after earnings and market looking and acting sick after such a huge rally yesterday doesn't make me feel confident right now.<<

I can't say I blame you. This market is torturous. The thought
of going down again to who knows where defies all logic, but you certainly can never rule out the possibility as we keep learning.

I don't know about this support stuff though. Remember Raymond
James said yesterday that we bounced off 200 DMA support twice
and that was strong acknowledgement by the market that we would move
up after we had "shaken out" some traders (or who ever he meant).
Then today, we open up below the support and move down.

IMO, there's some truth to all. I think today's market was
reacting very strongly to Greenspan's interest rate talk (which
was good yesterday). But in combination with the Long Term
Capital,which needed to get bailed out by
the FED just piles on a lot of negativity and fear to the market.

Remember how we try to figure out where COMS is going and we
usually qualify it with, "...as long as the market doesn't crack".
Well, I think today it cracked big time. Just look at the
banks, they've taken big hits already, and today they still take
some more. And since COMS is still in a vulnerable state, investor's
aren't going to jump into it wholeheartedly when it looks like
the market might do us all in anyways.

So, I don't know what the answers are, but I think this thing is
bigger than COMS. I think COMS report was at a minimum
"acceptable" and nothing in it worth punishing COMS. It was not
disappointing.

>>I guess Eric still has something to learn about analysts, I really thought he should have by now. He probably feels he's damned if he does and damned if he don't<<

I could be wrong, but I don't think he did anything wrong. After
the CFO talked to Paul Johnston in early May, COMS went down
alot. After all that, the earnings estimates were at least all
cut in half. So, the idea is to let COMS make earnings estimates
easily for the next several quarters until the company regained
itself. Well, that goal was met...and earnings were easily
beat. So, I think COMS did the right thing with the WS. In fact
it was one of the first things IMO that it started doing right
with WS to get it back on track. Anothewords they started
managing earnings expectations correctly.

>>plus this Paisley fella is the real one who needs to give the analyst's the most accurate projections possible, yet hold onto a few pennies in his pocket until that rainy day...<<

See, that's what I think they did, which is good. And last May, it
was Paisley who talked to Paul Weinstein and set off COMS huge
slide down to 24 the first time.

There's just too much fear in the market, and anything that doesn't
look rock solid is susceptible to being slaughtered.

Look at this news report I just got from WSJ:

Stocks tumbled Thursday, as anxiety about the financial sector's exposure to global economic turmoil sparked a sharp sell-off. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell more than 150 points, or 1.9%, to 8002. The Nasdaq Composite Index lost 40 points, or 2.3%, to 1720.



Anyways, I tired now, so I'll think about things more later.

I don't feel like riding things down again, but I'm not convinced
yet that we will be going down some more. Difficult to tell.

joe



To: matt fahy who wrote (22244)9/28/1998 12:54:00 AM
From: big john  Respond to of 45548
 
Did anyone notice the big jump in "Other income" without which earnings would have come in at .21. Barely a "penny ahead" of earnings. Any idea where this jump came from ?

big john