Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ANALYST10 who wrote (27087)	9/24/1998 6:32:00 PM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Rocketman said there finally doing something SEC prosecutes for: misleading press releases bogus financials bs contracts Hello again, Analyst10. I am tired of fighting, so you are free to take shots at me for whatever and I will not defend myself. I would rather talk about the company. Without an SB10, which we were all hoping for this week, we have no way of evaluating their financials or contracts. So for anyone to claim they have great financials, great contracts, or whatever, could be viewed as a hype, and I have certainly not read anyone saying anything like that lately. So what I would like to ask you is, why are their press releases misleading, their financials bogus, and their contracts bs? I mean, it is one thing to say they are unverified, and might be misleading, bogus, and bs, but if you have information that they are, I would like to know and so would many others. The Egypt MOU, for example, is puzzling to me because why would their lawyers clarify that this is not a contract, but just an MOU, when the PR stated that? Do you think it is because they included total minutes? As far as their financials, many of us would love to know what they are, because they have not released any. Do you know they are bogus? Seems to me this is critical information, if you have it, and we would all like to know. And their contracts being BS, would you amplify? I would like to raise the level of this conversation above personal attacks, so I admit that you are well versed in corporate analysis, and am asking honest questions. If you really want to help here, maybe we can engage in a mature, level discussion, and leave out any personal attacks or predictions that DGIV will either go to 10 bucks or 25 cents, I think either of those predictions, even if they pan out, could be categorized as inflammatory.