Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (27103)	9/24/1998 7:20:00 PM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Well, he has not yet replied to my offer, so I will give you my theory for what it's worth. I hesitate to give theories, because they might be wrong and you can go paranoid, but I am just connecting some dots. He keeps bringing up the stock detective even though we have not. The stock detective wrote a piece on MTEI many months ago, and that was a scam. They followed that up with a piece on INFE, which seemed curious because the only connection between those two stocks is that a lot of the same people were invested in both, and the "rocketeering" pseudo-group was bandied about. Shortly after that they wrote a piece on Digitcom, to fill out the three stocks a lot of us were invested in. Then MTEI stopped trading, being a scam. INFE lost a lot, I'm sure because of the "rocketeeting" and MTEI association. But DGIV stayed up. Now, if you were running stock detective, and wanted to make sure a stock you highlighted went down, would it not be in your best interest to go on the thread, or better yet, send an analyst to the thread, to try to bring it down? Then you could claim that all of the stocks you put in your red light district went down, and that would be a feather in your hat. So this is my theory. Is it right? Heck if I know. Is it plausible? Sure. But we individual investors are all the time accused of being paid (I wish) to post here, even though we have been here for six months and have seen our losses grow. So at least my theory makes sense. Analyst10: if I am wrong, my apologies. please tell us why you do post here so much, and not on any other thread. even if you think this is a scam, which you do, surely there are other scams out there, that are not only scams in theory but have had the whistle blown by the sec. can you tell us why you pick on digitcom and not those others? again, just an honest question, I am tired of fighting. if you want, you can insult me and i will not defend myself.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (27103)	9/24/1998 9:23:00 PM
From: William Brotherson	Respond to of 50264

Scott, Your last sentence about not trusting all that you read! I would like to say that you cannot TRUST "anything" that you read without outside "verification" good or bad. Only through time can you learn who to trust and who not to, and it is not from just one stock, nor from self proclaimed saviors. From all of the people who have tried to "SAVE US" that have come and gone, even my kids saw that DGIV would take some very heavy hits in price. Never thought that it would get this bad, but it sure didn't take an expert to predict it. A - You have had your gloat, your I told you so's, your I'm the greatest and this proves it. When is enough going to be enough for you? I feel bad for those that lost money because I am right there with them, on paper at least, I'm in the mud and blood at there side. Where are you, mr squeeky clean, never was in, never will be in, but you stand over all of us with your lording ways and say, I'm not here to say I told you so, but, I TOLD YOU SO!!! Well, my kids told me so as well.............. William Brotherson (wb229ahc@micron.net)