Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (5269)	9/24/1998 10:57:00 PM
From: alan w	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

And we're supposed to be proud of this brilliant ability to mislead? Come on. We've got to have someone better than this. This whole conversation is sickening. Who can lie the most accurately. Is this a great country, or what. alan w

To: dougjn who wrote (5269)	9/24/1998 11:55:00 PM
From: Les H	Respond to of 67261

From what I've heard so far, Clinton didn't restrict the term "sexual relations" enough to avoid purjury. Lewinsky described acts that fell under his definition as well as any reasonable definition. He apparently only admitted to acts that he thought she would admit to and not the ones that would be most embarrassing. If he hadn't tried to be too cute, the report wouldn't have to detail the incidents to the level to identify his purjurous statements. For all the planning Bill Clinton put into these acts, I wouldn't be surprised if he video taped his activities.