Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (5356)	9/25/1998 3:42:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

I quoted the Frank Rich piece elsewhere, my wife said there was a good Maureen Dowd piece that day too, but I missed it. Maureen Dowd has really had it in for Clinton ever since she got her op-ed column, it took the genius of Ken Starr to turn her around, I guess. Cheers, Dan.

To: dougjn who wrote (5356)	9/25/1998 4:06:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Its a culture war.>> This is by far the most accurate thing you have posted (which of course means I agree with you). What worries me is that people (on both sides) are willing to go to almost any lengths to win this war. It may well be a Pyrrhic (sp?) victory. Long-term we all lose if either side gets too strong, because both parties are being run primarily by the extremists. We just don't get many centrist candidates anymore. I keep hoping a way can be found to assign an appropriate punishment for Clinton's actions, because I like the Republicans sending bills to Clinton for signature. It keeps both sides open to compromise. I'm just as scared of too much liberal power as I am of too much conservative power.