SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cool who wrote (6987)9/25/1998 8:45:00 PM
From: Who, me?  Respond to of 13994
 
Hard to pick favorites at this point in time. There's a lot of good choices that could run. I'm pro-life so that will be important to me. I'm also very fiscally conservative so don't send me someone that wants to tell me about all the government programs he wants to give me. We need someone that truly wants smaller government! I'm a woman and any candidate that tries to coddle the feminazis will turn me off. The "year of the woman" will probably be wiped out in November, thank God.

The 2000 election will be very interesting, to say the least!



To: cool who wrote (6987)9/25/1998 11:33:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13994
 
I think Bradley is a much better choice. Kerry is much too pompous. There are many contenders on the Repub. side. However, I don't think that any of the current crop, Quayle, Alexander, Forbes, Keyes, etc. are electable. GW Bush, Jr. is in a different category but I understand he may not run. JLA