SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (7592)9/25/1998 8:41:00 PM
From: JACK R. SMITH JR.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14226
 
Richard,

If you expect me to disagree with you, you will be disappointed. I do not. This news coupled with recent news ain't playing well in Peoria, and it ain't playing well in Arkansas. We are hanging on by our fingernails and they are eating cake and playing with the pipes! I have said before in different ways at different times and here it is--if it ain't profitable production, it ain't crap!! Clearly, at this point, it ain't crap!!

Looks to me like their "in-house" analytical capabilities are rather "out house"!

I understand the problems in a startup operation, but damn, they could leave the sword in the sheath, then when they fall on it, It would not be so painful.

I have three mining consultants in mind who used to be actors. Curly, Moe and Larry. At least they could make the operation more entertaining.

Larger "digestion" tanks will stand idle until they have been released from the "cease and decist" order by AZDEQ.

There is nothing in the relese to tell us anything of substance. Clearly, the results were less than expected, but what does that mean?
Were they expecting 2000 ounces and only got 1500? Were they expecting 50 and got 10? What shipment was that nice dark resin that Mr.Mckay reported seeing?

No, I am not a happy camper here, Jack!!




To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (7592)9/26/1998 1:27:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14226
 
Richard: Once again, it appears GPGI has cried wolf. And this time it sounded so convincing.

I wonder if whoever has been unloading those large blocks of shares knew anything about GPGI's problem with indigestion.