Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (5423)	9/25/1998 11:26:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

In case you haven't noticed, I am not a Ken Starr fan. I'm disappointed in his referral. That doesn't mean I can let you and your ilk get away with spewing your venom on Gingrich, Bush, Reagan or whomever without proper factual basis. Sorry if that bothers you. Maybe you should stick to issues and facts instead of attacking politicians you disagree with as somehow evil.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (5423)	9/25/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Hey, have you read your own posts and some of the other Clintonistas on this thread? JLA

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (5423)	9/25/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 67261

<<You have done nothing but spew hate toward republicans, offering no real insight. The Bush and Thomas issues are past and not directly comparable because there was no allegation of perjury or obstruction of justice, as the IC has referred about Clinton. Even if you can't, the Congress will surely stay on topic and most will put aside petty partisan politics. >> No allegation of perjury or obstruction of justice, in Iran/Contra, wrt. Bush. The Bush issue is past, true. He was very successful in his little coverup. Mr Walsh's opinion differs from yours, but he's a stooge, unlike the righteous avatar of justice Ken Starr. Daniel, I'm having trouble seeing where Mr. Walsh's opinion differs from mine. Yes, he was a stooge. But there is no dispute on facts. He never made an impeachment referral to congress. Such non referral did not include perjury and obstruction, obviously. I know it is difficult for us to peer through your venom, but I think you again don't know what you're talking about.