Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (5436)	9/26/1998 8:37:00 AM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

dougjn - re: "the sex sinning, and sex lying, is predictive of very little else." Would you say the same if the person doing it were sitting across the courtroom, and you and your client were accusing him of sexual harassment in a civil matter? Mr. K.

To: dougjn who wrote (5436)	9/26/1998 2:47:00 PM
From: Marty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<Perhaps a bit of an exaggeration, but there is some of the same flavor.>> Re: Starr and McCarthy Thanks, Doug, for the expanded analogy. Actually, I was thinking more about Starr's same reckless readiness and willingness to ruin so many lives over some perceived limitless charter. Whether it was done for self-aggrandizement or for partisanship purposes didn't matter. Constitutional rights didn't seem to matter or the shadow it cast over the relationship between the government and the people. My point about sex and lying about it is, that to profess such SHOCK (Shocked, I tell you!) over it is just so plain phoney that it has to be obvious that it is transparent partisanship run wild.