SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (19829)9/26/1998 8:54:00 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116758
 
What David Tice has to say about the bailout:
(what a sharp sort)
<Picture><Picture>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1998

Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is certainly Wall Street's favorite central banker of all time. From his very first months at the helm of our nations financial system back in the fall of 1987, he has acted publicly to protect the stock market. The day after "Black Monday" in 1987 he stated his willingness to flood the system with liquidity if necessary to protect investors. He won great kudos, especially from Wall Street, for leading a quick recovery in stock prices that ensured a boom in the global economy in the late 1980's. Unfortunately, this boom also led to a boom and bust in real estate and junk bonds that led directly to the S&L bailout and the US recession in the early 1990s. Importantly, the late 1980s global boom also led to the Japanese bubble that, even today, a decade later, jeopardizes the global financial system. But Mr. Greenspan came to the rescue again in the early 1990s, with an unprecedented drop in interest rates down to 3%. The economy did recover but our financial system has never been the same since.

In response to Mr. Greenspan's low interest rates, many small investors took their money out of bank savings and CDs and sent them into mutual funds or bought stock directly. It became popular to buy mutual funds that invested in emerging markets such as Mexico and Indonesia. At the same time, many banks, hedge funds, and investors like Orange County decided to aggressively speculate, borrowing at low short-term rates and lending at higher long-term rates. Born here was huge leveraged speculation and the popularity of derivatives. Unfortunately, when a strong economy forced the Fed to raise rates in 1994, many of these speculative trades, with Orange Country's bankruptcy filing a memorable example, blew up with huge losses. When these speculations were forced to unwind, interest rates shot up. This was particularly damaging for billion of dollars that had gone to speculate in Mexican stock and bond markets. As capital tried to flee, the Mexican currency and financial system faltered into a severe crisis. Here, Mr. Greenspan again saved the day with an unprecedented bailout that protected the speculators.

Not only did Mexico recover, the US stock market and economy boomed like never before. It is hard to believe that the Dow began 1995 at about 3,800 and the NASDAQ 100 at 400, and hardly took a break until this year with the Dow and NASDAQ 100 topping at 9368 and 1485, respectively. The US financial markets and economy become uncontrollable bubbles. Euphoric investors and speculators, much encouraged to take risks after the Mexican bailout, also flooded money into SE Asia, Russia and Latin America leading to massive financial and economic bubbles, a massive boom that is now a terrible bust. Indeed, today's severe global financial crisis is the predictable and inevitable result of such excess. Each time Mr. Greenspan intervenes to protects the market, he only encourages even more senseless excesses leading to an only larger boom and inevitable bust. Not surprisingly, today's global crisis, one that is really much the product of an overheated US financial system, is impacting the US markets and, inevitably, the US economy. Markets now teeter close to financial collapse.

Bullish investors and analysts, however, believe that Mr. Greenspan can guarantee the continuation of the bull market. Today, markets rallied strongly as Greenspan made it quite clear that he now sees heightened risk to the US economy and financial system and he is willing to lower rates and take other actions to ensure continued US prosperity. All he is really doing, however, is ensuring even greater excesses and a more catastrophic bust. Just look at the wild speculation in the internet stocks. Gains so far this week include Yahoo up 30%, Excite 42%, Broadcast.com 55% and Amazon.com 31% as the Internet index surged 10%. Strong gains also for the Dow, gaining 3%, and the S&P500 up almost 5%. Huge gains are seen for technology stocks as the NASDAQ 100 and Morgan Stanley High Tech index gained 7%. Financial stocks also boomed with the bank and broker indexes also up nearly 7%. With this Greenspan rally, mutual fund companies are also reporting huge inflows as investors see the Fed Chairman as making stocks "a sure thing."

It is just so unfortunate that today's acute global financial crisis is seen with such amazing complacency. While investors should be very worried and acting aggressively to reduce risk and protect capital, they have instead been trained to trust Mr. Greenspan and mindlessly buy stocks. This is a tragedy. We certainly don't believe that this the proper role of the Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

IS THE CURRENT STOCK MARKET "A BUBBLE"?

"Bubble" - a light hollow ball, Webster's II. The stock market is a "bubble" looking for a pin. The purchase of a securities at one price may be an investment, at a higher price - speculation, at an even higher price - irrational exuberance, and today, 2500 points above "irrational exuberance", the greater fool theory.

Everyone is investing in the market. People buy at high prices and expect to sell at ever-higher prices. The overall stock market is selling at the highest valuation in more than seventy years. People have forgotten that in order to "buy low, and sell high", you have to sell.

It is extremely rare for a Federal Reserve Chairman to warn investors about the stock market. This has happened only twice before in this century (1929, 1965), and in both cases, a severe bear market followed that required more than twenty years to breakeven after inflation. Alan Greenspan chooses his words very carefully. Yet Greenspan referred to the stock market as "a bubble" in a prepared speech when the Dow was about 6000.

Only in a bubble can a stock like At Home Corporation be worth $2 billion on its first day of trading when it posted revenue of only $2 million and lost $23 million for its previous six months. Slow-growing companies like Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola are posting sales growth of 4% and 2%, respectively, yet are selling at 31 and 41 times earnings. Normally, the P/E's of stocks sell closer to their growth rates. These companies have been posting earnings growth slightly faster than sales, but not by much, and this never lasts forever. In the 1960's, people justified paying-up for great companies that would continue to grow, but look at their market returns from 1973-74 - (Coca-Cola -70%, Walt Disney Co -85%, PepsiCo -67%).

So why can't I wait until the end gets closer? "Times are too good now for the bubble to burst yet", you say. I only wish it was this easy. People always ignore history. They fail to realize that markets always get the most overvalued when times appear to be wonderful. The view is always clearest at the top. But it "feels so good" when the economy is strong, and everyone is making money "hand over fist" that people ignore the perils of a ridiculously overvalued market. Stock market moves nearly always precede economic events, and therefore people rarely predict the event which might cause a market decline. But in a bubble, they always think they can. When times are the best, all you have left is risk.

Stock markets never go up forever. It's not as easy as Wall Street would like you to believe. It isn't typical for money to be given away on Wall Street, but with the Dow Jones average increasing at a 19% rate since 1982, it seems like it. Consider the recent warnings of Greenspan, Buffett and Templeton. Think more about preservation of capital and less about greed. Expressing caution today is like being against motherhood and apple pie. History does repeat itself, so to protect yourself and your family's future, don't invest in a "bubble".

IMHO - this guy knows how to hedge! Said he is buying HM & NEM.
rh



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (19829)9/26/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 116758
 
As New Russian Govt Falls Out, Protest Plans Grow
10:06 a.m. Sep 26, 1998 Eastern

By Alastair Macdonald

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia seemed as far as ever from sorting out its economic chaos Saturday.

A former deputy premier who walked out Friday after just nine days in office lambasted his erstwhile colleagues and said cash from the International Monetary Fund would be held up for months as Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov dithers over strategy between leftist and liberal options.

Communist party leader Gennady Zyuganov met the head of the main trade union body and agreed on tactics for a nationwide day of protest on October 7. They are seeking months of overdue wages and pensions and want President Boris Yeltsin to resign.

Unpaid scientists and research workers announced plans to seal off main roads into Moscow and a newspaper said that one army garrison, pushed to the brink by wage delays and lack of food, was ready to block the Trans-Siberian railway with tanks.

''The government is in crisis,'' said the business newspaper Kommersant-Daily following centrist Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Shokhin's decision to walk out on the government after Primakov re-appointed liberal Finance Minister Mikhail Zadornov.

Shokhin bitterly criticized Zadornov, accusing him of a key role in the effective debt default and rouble devaluation launched by the last government on August 17, and also hit out at Primakov for trying to fuse conflicting political interests.

''When they invited me into the government they clearly intended to use me as window dressing for the West and so there was no question of my having any influence in drafting the government program,'' he told a news conference.

Primakov is still struggling to form a cabinet with broad support to combat the crisis. He was confirmed in office two weeks ago by the Communist-led parliament after it forced Yeltsin to drop a bid to install ex-premier Viktor Chernomyrdin.

The former foreign minister has assured the West that market reforms will go on tempered with aid for industry and the poor.

He called Shokhin's walkout ''irresponsible,'' but said his government, towards which the communists have also been cooling rapidly, would not be weakened by it.

Yet 24 hours later there was still no word on who might take over Shokhin's duties as deputy premier in charge of finance and negotiations with international creditors.

Shokhin himself said his departure could favor communist First Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Maslyukov, once head of Soviet planning who has been pushing for aid to industry, or prompt Primakov to add another liberal to his handful of deputies.

Whatever happens, Primakov seems no nearer resolving fundamental differences in policy approach between free market liberals like Zadornov, who favor a tighter money policy, and Maslyukov and new central bank chief Viktor Gerashchenko, who play down the risks of inflation and favor printing cash to pay off rouble debts and refloat the paralyzed banking system.

Foreign investors, who have suffered badly in Russia this year, are anxious to see coherent plans to sort out the mess.

But Shokhin, who held talks with the International Monetary Fund last week, said it was now unlikely that some $4.3 billion, the second tranche of a $22.6 billion credit arranged by the IMF in July, would arrive before late December at the earliest.

It had been due this month and Shokhin has warned that without it Russia risks defaulting on its foreign debt as well as the domestic debts frozen in August. Such a default would make it very hard for Moscow to win new investment in future.

While that will worry financial markets, Western governments may be as worried by the protests that are gathering steam for October 7, raising the risk of new political instability.

''Army Ready for War -- Civil War,'' headlined the liberal daily Sevodnya on its front page. It quoted a security service report saying officers in one garrison in the Far East were ready to block rail lines with tanks to back up demands for pay.

''If even the General Staff recognizes that the situation among the troops is explosive and threatening, it means they are not entirely sure that they can control their subordinates during any abnormal situation,'' the paper said. ''In that case, dealing with a financial default would seem like child's play.''

Communist leader Zyuganov and Mikhail Shmakov, leader of the Federation of Independent Trade Unions, said after their talks that the rallies would call for Yeltsin to quit two years early.

''People have one demand -- Yeltsin must go,'' Zyuganov was quoted as saying by Interfax news agency.

The patience of ordinary Russians has yet to snap en masse after seven years of painful post-Soviet reforms and previous days of action have not lived up to the organizers' forecasts.

However, Zyuganov noted that hundreds of thousands of previously prosperous white-collar workers in Moscow had lost their jobs in last month's financial collapse and he now expected the embryonic middle-class to join the protests.

Copyright 1998 Reuters Limited.



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (19829)9/26/1998 6:50:00 PM
From: Alex  Respond to of 116758
 
Investment guru with the world on his shoulders

Mark Mobius is the Pied Piper of emerging markets. AMANDA HALL speaks to him about the turmoil in the global economy

'We are in a very critical situation because the rules of the game are beginning to fall apart'

MARK Mobius almost fell of his exercise bike in a London hotel gym early one morning last week. He was reading the financial pages and spied an article about the International Monetary Fund and how it is warming to the idea of establishing controls to restrict money flows around the world.

"If everyone adopts exchange controls, global investing as we know it may be over," says the 63-year-old American with no hair and a delivery so measured that if you are not paying close attention, it is easy to miss the significance of what he says.

To repeat: "Global investing as we know it may be over." Now, most ordinary people do not worry about that sort of thing. They might get a little anxious about interest rates over their cereal, but they do not give themselves a heart attack over the IMF.

But Mark Mobius is not an ordinary person. He is a guru. And in particular, he is a guru of emerging markets. In fact, he is the guru of emerging markets. And if you are the guru of emerging markets you worry very, very much about the IMF. Right now, you also worry very, very much about emerging markets because things are not looking good.

Dr J Mark Mobius, to give him his official title, is a fund manager. He works for Templeton Worldwide, the American mutual fund business and right now has about $10-billion of other people's money to look after. In fact, some of it is his own; he will not say how much it is, probably a few million dollars.

The bad news for Mobius is that a year ago that $10-billion was $14-billion. The money is spread between seven different funds and are all invested in the emerging markets of Asia, Russia, Eastern Europe and Latin America. Which explains why, in the last year, he has managed to lose $4-billion. If there is one place you did not want your pension invested in the past year, it was emerging markets.

In London, shares in his Emerging Markets Investment Trust - around 150p a year ago - are now languishing at 62.5p.

So what went wrong? Gurus are not meant to get it wrong; that is why they are gurus. After all, if the world's Pied Piper of emerging markets loses $4-billion in a year, what hope is there for the rest of us? He says he reduced his exposure to Russia and Thailand before the worst hit. "But we can't exit countries completely otherwise we'd end up with cash and that's not what our clients want."

And is President Clinton right when he says the world economy is facing its most serious challenge in half a century? "Yeah," he says, in between measured mouthfuls of muesli. "I would agree with that. It started in the emerging world and now it's spreading and it's going to impact America and Europe. Japan was already in trouble, but the real problems started with the devaluation of the Thai baht last year. I would say we are in a very critical situation because the rules of the game are beginning to fall apart." Given we have travelled at the speed of light from emerging markets to America to Europe to Japan and landed in Thailand, I am not exactly sure which rules and which game he is talking about.

"The new rules," he says, "in the open world order were that investors would be able to repatriate their capital and profits. Now with the move by Malaysia (to introduce currency controls that mean foreign investors are not free to take their money out), that rule is broken. So the international community is facing a possible shutdown of capital flows of more countries copy."

If you were hoping for some good news about the state of the global economy, you can stop reading now. Mobius has none to give. A huge 20% of his funds are now in cash, although he is just beginning to spot buying opportunities in Brazil, Poland, Thailand and SA. Countries to avoid at all cost, he says, are Nigeria and Ukraine.

As benefits an extraordinary man, Mobius leads an extraordinary life. Ask him where home is and he says he has two: one in Singapore and one in Hong Kong, but then he tells you he is only there for two months of the year. His parents were German, but he was born in Brooklyn and has spent more than 20 years living and working in Asia. Ask what he is up to this week and he tells you today and tomorrow he is in London meeting investors, then Germany, then Sweden and right now he is on his way to Tokyo.

No wonder he needs his own Gulfstream jet, waiting at Stansted Airport, to whisk him and his posse of eager young analysts around the globe. Five of them are sitting at the next table having breakfast: probably discussing the IMF, I imagine, and keeping a watchful eye on their master to see if it is time to go. In fact, those who know him say he needs to be managed on the time-keeping front - like most gurus, he probably has far more important things to worry about than time. But does he ever get lonely, leading that sort of life?

"Lonely?" he says, as if he cannot quite grasp what I mean. "No, I'm involved in work."

Mobius is really not like the rest of us. For starters he has more qualifications than most company boards have between them: bachelors and masters degree from Boston University, a PhD in economics and political science from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, not to mention his studies and the universities of Wisconsin, New Mexico and Kyoto. When he talks about money worries, he means the trillions of dollars that shoot round the world every day "in search of safety and income", not the balance on his current account.

Many emerging market countries, like Russia, he says, were simply not ready to open their markets to free-flowing global capital. While he points to the likes of George Soros and Julian Robertson of Tiger Management as the big hedge fund players, he says they cannot be blamed "because they are only playing the game according to the rules allowed by the authorities".

His solution to the impact of hedge fund shorting, radical though it sounds, is two-fold: close down the futures market and forbid people to short stocks.

As Mobius dashes off to his hotel room to put on his tie and jacket, I cannot help thinking that it is no wonder he does not lead an ordinary life. Anyone who chooses to immerse himself in the financial and political worlds of emerging markets, where terms like "illicit assets" appear on balance sheets, would never be happy trudging to the office at 9am and home at 6pm every day.

When I quiz him on his ideal holiday, I expect him to say he never takes them. Instead, he says Sardinia. "In one of those healthy hotels where they have mud baths, you know?"

Just the sort of thing a guru should do on holiday. - The Sunday Telegraph.

btimes.co.za



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (19829)9/27/1998 11:18:00 AM
From: goldsnow  Respond to of 116758
 
Goldman Sachs to adandon £10bn float
By Neil Bennett, City Editor

GOLDMAN Sachs, the US investment bank, will this week announce it is postponing its £10 billion flotation because of turmoil in world financial markets. The firm's 190 partners are to meet tomorrow in a worldwide video conference to decide on the terms of the delay. A possible delay in the float was revealed in yesterday's Telegraph.

The flotation, announced earlier this year, would have seen the partners receive shares worth more than £50 million each. The partners include Gavyn Davies, the firm's chief economist in Europe, who is a close confidant and unofficial adviser to Gordon Brown.

Goldman is expected to announce on Tuesday morning that it is postponing the float until market conditions are calmer and the world's stock markets recover from their slump.

Some partners say that Goldman could pledge to remain a partnership, but most insist that the float will eventually go ahead. The firm has been forced to pull its float because profits have slumped in recent weeks and international investors are now unwilling to invest in a major investment bank. The firm had wanted to sell a minimum of 10 per cent of its share for £1 billion.

Goldman last week announced a 19 per cent fall in earnings between June and August and said that profits for the last months of the year would be sharply down.

Since then, the firm's difficulties have worsened. It is one of the 14 banks and financial houses which have mounted a rescue operation to shore up Long Term Capital Management, the vast hedge fund which almost collapsed owing more than £100 billion. Goldman has invested more than £100 million in the fund.

The announcement this week will be in sharp contrast to the euphoria of last June when Goldman's partners met in New York and agreed to press ahead with a float. Jon Corzine, Goldman's chairman, is expected to send a voicemail message to the firm's 11,000 employees on Tuesday, reassuring them that Goldman's finances are still robust and that it will continue to press ahead with a future flotation.

Goldman insiders say that tomorrow night's meeting is no longer about whether to delay the float but how. The firm is unlikely to set a new date since it would create a hostage to fortune. If, for example, it delayed the float until March and share prices continued to plummet the firm would have to announce yet another delay.

But the delay will cause all manner of legal and technical difficulties. For a start, the firm was due to create up to 30 new partners at the end of the year if it had stayed a partnership. Goldman must now decide what to do about them, whether to make them partners or give them some type of other special status.

Another thorny issue is Goldman's partnership status. If the firm does not float by the end of May it must reconstitute itself as a partnership which would tie the firm in legal knots. After that it would have to restart the flotation process at almost square one. The process has been costly and time-consuming and Goldman would hate to have to scrap it only to start again, but the markets may leave it no choice. The legal and technical details of the delay will take months to sort out.

No one will pity Goldman's partners too much this week. Their partnership fund still makes them fabulously wealthy, float or no float.
telegraph.co.uk