Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (5516)	9/26/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: dougjn	Respond to of 67261

I doubt it. She made that statement, and mused that she was considering contempt IF there was perjury. She made that statement before she had heard the President's more fulsome explanation of his Jones testimony that he gave in his grand jury video taped testimony. The judge had only heard Clinton's public "confession" later that evening. Which could certainly make her believe that bald perjury MIGHT have been committed. The most troubling thing in that deposition, I think, was Bennett's statement. I'm not certain that precisely the same standards apply there. Clinton's it depends on what the meaning of "is" is, although much ridiculed in the electronic media, is actually completely right so far as perjury standards are concerned. But I'm not certain that covers his lawyer making an argument to the Judge, rather than Clinton responding to his adversary's deposition questions. exchange2000.com Doug