Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flickerful who wrote (53949)	9/26/1998 3:19:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

I agree with this part: "Tyranny begins when any power of any sort interferes with an individual's private life or personal affairs." A perfect example of tyranny is Clinton's abuse of the Judicial process, starting from his lying in the Jones' deposition about a matter that did include some private parts, exposed to Ms. Jones. This part: "A statesman is answerable to public opinion or to the law only for his public acts." is utter nonsense. And anyway, the Oval Office is indeed a public office, which Clinton used for an ejaculation chamber. I don't approve of that, nor the lying under oath to a public court to hide those acts.

To: flickerful who wrote (53949)	9/26/1998 7:28:00 PM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

flickerful: I find it sad, that the same folks that are rallying around Clinton would have been yelling "hang'em high" if Bush had done the same! The general population of this country knows who legislated all the give-away programs over the last 30 years, as well as the countries abroad with their hands out! I am sure Hillary orchestrated this coalition from behind the scenes! Remember what Hillary said when asked by a reporter...”what would have happened if she (Hillary) had married the guy she was dating (son of a wealthy auto dealership owner) before Clinton”...Hillary responded...“I guess he would have become President, then”! That has got to make you stop and think... Regards, LG

To: flickerful who wrote (53949)	9/26/1998 9:25:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58727

flickerful-- i dont think anyone would disagree with the statement. its true. it is the issue that has to be decided, whether the public acts were right or wrong. this is ill-timed in that it is before all the facts are available to us. what is worse is that they have lost a great deal of credibility for criticizing starr, someone who was doing the job he was assigned to do, investigate wrong doing on the part of the president. i sincerely hope the republicans are not hoping that moral indignation will help them. i would add this though...the clintons will find public support difficult to come by if the dow drops below 7k and we start having real economic problems. good luck to all, trey