Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (14405)	9/26/1998 4:26:00 PM
From: kemosabe	Respond to of 18444

Meaningful or not, we now have a market maker that will support the stock. Maybe others will follow. Now what we really need is some long overdue disclosure from the company. kemosabe

To: Jon Tara who wrote (14405)	9/26/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: Brady B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Jon... Would you please point me toward a non-underwriter report. I am curious and would like to read one. Any one will do. bb

To: Jon Tara who wrote (14405)	9/27/1998 10:45:00 AM
From: aleta	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

I understand what you're saying Jon, but my point is this, Hornblower and Weeks are an old and reputable firm. I totally agree with an earlier statement you made. a business that has no morals nor conscience will not untimately survive. They have survived a long time. I sincerely don't believe they would tout a company unless they believed the company had some merit, even if they were the MM's for that company. It wouldn't be worth their reputation. I'm sure there are many companies that they are MM's for and they could just as easily have chosen one of them couldn't they? It is apparent to me that they were looking at the industry by the fact that they also chose to report on DCLK as well. This can't possibly be bad for ESVS that they chose to compare the two side by side.