SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (67746)9/27/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: divvie  Respond to of 176387
 
I agree that the tendency is to move to more distributed best of breed applications, but the key has to be to maintain data integrity. We have a number of different front office trading systems that link to the outside world and to our back office. Something as simple as setting up a customer needs to be controlled to such an extent that the customer code given by Reuters in their dealing system (that links to the outside world) has to be mapped to the customers set up in the position keeping and mark to market system which has to be mapped to the customer in the back office settlements and GL system. We have traders trying to bring in systems that they have worked with in the past, they by-pass IT, get the vendor in and then everyone realizes that IT needs to get involved to set IP addresses, virtual drive mappings, start up scripts to ensure that the users profile maps to the application, etc., the data mapping and so on.
The more IT savvy the business units get the more the situation you described, with those units trying to procure and maintain the systems outside of IT will happen. But the whole networking infrastructure gets more complex. This is not my field but when I implement a simple NT application I have to get different sets of people to ensure that the virtual LAN that the traders use will be accessable to the VLAN that the application server is going to be on. This whole hubs/routers/switches area that Gary knows about is too complex for me but I have to deal with the people that know it, and it is not always easy (not through anyone's fault).
I know I'm really getting off your main point, which I agree with you on, but I just wanted to discuss a little the actual logistics of implementation rather than the distributed functions of the software. The whole NT Back Office suite is getting more complex and as MSFT try to make NT as bullet proof as Unix, NT itself will only get more complex. Still, I have no doubt that it will win the OS wars eventually. Shame.
BTW, thanks for all the info so far on ERP and SCM. I am interested in the area and became much more focused on it when you described DELL's use of the systems.