To: John Mansfield  who wrote (13 ) 9/27/1998 7:17:00 AM From: John Mansfield     Respond to    of 44  
PM Discussion: Ken / John on international aspects of Y2k 'To: Ken Salaets (who wrote...)      From: John Mansfield                                            Saturday, Sep 26 1998 5:10PM ET      Ken,     What do you think of the following argumentation:     - IT personnel are key to solving the Y2k problem; they are increasingly short in     demand;     - Lowering visa requirements, increasing wages etc. well attracts foreign IT personnel     to other countries that have a more attractive bid;     - This might even pose a barrier to cooperation between nations on Y2k; as the     interest of one nation (e.g. the US) is not served by informing other nations (e.g. Latin     American) on Y2k issues.     This might (partly) explain the lack of public political pressure by US/UK/Canada on     lagging nations, e.g. France and Germany.     John ________________ ________ 'John, the U.S. economy is so intertwined with our trading partners, I cannot imagine     that the U.S. would withhold information from other countries. Indeed, the Feds are     aggressively reaching out to other governments, particularly in the third world. A     number of my member companies are assisting in the effort.     Having said that, there's also little doubt that the market forces will have some influence     over where key personnel practice their trades.      We're all in this together, and while the problem will no doubt have a greater impact in     some countries, all will be affected. IMHO.     Ken  _____________- John: <<     John, the U.S. economy is so intertwined with our trading partners, I cannot imagine     that the U.S. would withhold information from other countries. Indeed, the Feds are     aggressively reaching out to other governments, particularly in the third world. A     number of my member companies are assisting in the effort.     Having said that, there's also little doubt that the market forces will have some influence     over where key personnel practice their trades.      We're all in this together, and while the problem will no doubt have a greater impact in     some countries, all will be affected. IMHO.     >>     I agree with you that we are all in this together. Still; market forces are simply draining     South American programmers towards the US; combined with the eased visa laws this     does not bode well at all for those SA countries. Some months ago I read an article     about US head hunters literally scavenging those countries, offering 2 - 5 times their     current SA wages.     Also, I remember some UK official stating that they wanted the UK to becomde the     European 'safe Y2k haven'.      I simply do NOT see that much pressure by e.g. UK on other European countries to     fight Y2k. You have to keep in mind that in recent years many UK programmers went     to the continent, where they could earn much more.     When a worst case scenario pans out, many countries will revert for quite some time to     a semi 'self sufficient' status (especially if international travel would break down for a     longer period; not unthinkable to me).     We might then well see a trend to 'each country fighting for itself'.     Also, I have seen no thoughts at all on what will happen when some countries are much     more advanced than others (extreme example: UK and Netherlands much advanced;     electricity/water still working more or less; and a total breakdown in e.g. Italy.      In Europe people are now free to move and live in other countries (Schengen treaty);     this scenario would result in tremendous (nationalistic) potential pressures.     Same argument may be valid for different states in the US.     Any thoughts?     Regards,     John ______________ Ken: 'South America will go the way as most other regions, i.e., their IT industry will be     heavily controlled if not owned by U.S. multi-nationals. It is already happening to a     much greater extent that is being reported in the media. If anything, Y2K will expedite     the process.     >> In Europe people are now free to move and live in other countries (Schengen     treaty); this scenario would result in tremendous (nationalistic) potential pressures.     Probably true, but in my view, if Y2K wasn't the catalyst, the Europeans would find     some other reason. While a great idea on paper, I still think that Europe will never     realize the unity that the Commission politicos seek. The "project" will collapse due to     internecine warfare among the national and regional nomenklatura.     I anticipate Britain regaining a significant degree of its economic status (within Europe)     as a result of the fall-out from Y2K. However, it will be short-lived. Germany is     essentially playing a role similar to the Free Democrats within their own system. In     other words, they are a natural, historical and economic bridge between the West and     the East, and are quite content playing each side (at the risk of over-simplicity,     America and Russia) off of the other. Even if Kohl manages to pull another electoral     rabbit out of his hat, Germany has already started to move East politically, and in some     respects, culturally. If Kohl loses -- and it looks like he will -- then that movement will     become more visible and methodical.     All my views, mind you, but I like to think that I am a fairly rational student of EU     affairs. And keep in mind that I was the first one to begin dismantling the Wall -- May     1989. I broke off a chunk and announced to my colleagues that my action was the     beginning of the end of that bloody ediface. Now how's that for an over-blown view of     one's self? LOL! [And I was there when it DID open, although unfortunately I was in     Bonn rather than Berlin. Na ja.].     Hey, maybe we should take this to the board? ggg.     Ken