SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: flickerful who wrote (53983)9/26/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: Trey McAtee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58727
 
flickerful--

i disagree...

the law is not the issue. ever widening investigations are actually quite normal where one event leads into another. to be certain, to settle this completely, we would have to analyse what starr was following specifically.

maybe the law does need to be fine tuned, but that is a something that will take a while to settle.

as a side note to the original post regarding the petition...who actually gives a damn what the french think. does anyone? i hope common europe does become a reality so we can once and for all marginalize these ridiculous people.

good luck to all,
trey



To: flickerful who wrote (53983)9/26/1998 11:07:00 PM
From: HairBall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58727
 
flicker: Let me see if I can make a point with you!

- Starr was appointed by The Attorney General.

- The Attorney General was appointed by Clinton.

- The Attorney General works for Clinton.

- Starr works for The Attorney General.

- Clinton is the boss. He is ultimately responsible for his employees. The buck must stop at Clinton's feet!

- If Starr was doing a bad job, Clinton should have fired him.

Maybe Clinton and Reno conspired to give all the assignments to Starr so they could do just what they have been doing...bitch about how much money this one guy has spent, how long he has been at it and sling slurs that Starr has a vendetta against Clinton.

Why did they not, just appoint a different Independent Council for each issue? Well if they had, they could not bitch and make all the false charges against Ken Starr. Criminal, but brilliant!

Open up your eyes and see the TRUTH!

Regards,
LG