SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonyt who wrote (25799)9/27/1998 12:53:00 PM
From: Cheryl Galt  Respond to of 32384
 
** Another OT **

Yes, Tony, I agree. This is "Another interesting story" [bailout of hedge funds]

An IMPORTANT story, IMO

--- THIS sure was ONE way of trying to "bring the existing instabilities to a level of stability reasonably shortly" (A.G.)

--- I have to agree with Ken Guenther:
The bailout "underscores the hypocrisy of those who advocate the free
market."

--- I also have to agree with "Other"
-------(WHY QUOTE marks, but no ATTRIBUTION ???
--------- sleezy journalism. IMO)
--- 'Others said that the Fed's involvement could backfire, creating a "moral hazard" in financial markets that would cause investors to take ever greater risks, secure in the knowledge that regulators would prevent a collapse.'

IMO, From their choice of responses to this news story, the WSJ's perspective on the issue is pretty clear. In this case, the WSJ's slant matches my own bias.

Regards,
Cheryl



To: tonyt who wrote (25799)9/27/1998 4:01:00 PM
From: Cheryl Galt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
***OT*** Bailout, or Bankruptcy ??

Tony, just saw another interesting slant on the hedge fund story

from an SI poster, another Henry
- Message 5828768
----------------
To this greenhorn, the above post sounds logical, if a <ii>bit optimistic.

But in a response post, someone name-called at Henry V. (most un-civilly):

>> May I say that the world financial system is in tatters....
>> but it just doesn't know it yet?
>> As usual you are an ornament to our discussion here.

Creative name-calling - almost a varsity sport on SI! ;>)
-----------------------------

Any comments on these points of view?
--- and whether the finance issues might impact biotechs?
--- or affect the Markets, in such a way that biotechs might be affected?

Just watching the bouncing ball ....
Regards,
Cheryl
--------------------------------------------------------------

PS - ALERT: It's 4PM EDT. Game Time. Call Henry!

Seattle Seahawks vs Pittsburg Steelers ---Pittsburg favored by NFL "analysts"
--- because Seattle (3-0) played marshmallows in their last three games.

BUT the Steelers' offense is weak IMO
AND last week (against the Redskins) our defense scored more points than our offense.
-- Nice combination in our favor, IMO, that the NFL spin doctors aren't counting on.
-- Just watch those interceptions and sacks!!! Poor Pittsburg ...