Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mark S. Schroeder who wrote (27398)	9/27/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: woody	Respond to of 50264

In my opinion we should not be demanding that the sb-10 be filed. Remember, that there are several ways to get off the BBs. Lets let things progress JCs way for the time being. Calling and demanding things from the company right now is the last thing we want to do. We have a very critical period ahead of us. IMHO from a business fundamentals standpoint we are still on track. We just didnt handle the investor relations piece very well. If the company has had to "adjust some plans" recently" well join the club. I can assure you that MANY if not all multi-nationals are also adjusting their plans in this business climate. I am long and confident that 6-12 months from now the stock price will be much higher. My opinion only of course.

To: Mark S. Schroeder who wrote (27398)	9/27/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: Moonglow	Respond to of 50264

Hi Mark! One thing I think I've learned too, is not to talk about the charting. Do I use it? Oh my, yes.....but to really be effective, it must be analyzed everyday....and when changes come, one must be ready to use them. If one makes a prediction, and then a change comes, it could only hurt others. I'll give an example. DGIV....my prediction for July. The charts showed that July was going to be a VERY good month, and I stated that publicly. Same with SGNC....chart showed that August was going to be good. Were the charts wrong on those two? Well, yeah....but only for the prediction given a few weeks in advance. For the daily observer, one could see the changes coming and adjust accordingly. When DGIV did not do well in July, it changed the focus of everything. Now if I were to say that the chart for October was good...and it wasn't...then some might get hurt. Same way if I were to say that the chart for October looks like dog dung....and it wasn't, then some could still get hurt. What I will say is that I am looking for a change to come, and so far it hasn't. I think it's better to focus on and talk about the facts. The lack of the SB-10 is a fact. And you're right...it has got to be out soon in order for investor confidence to be restored. The new shares that are proposed to be issued is a major new development in my opinion. Ask yourself what do new shares issued usually mean for the price of a stock? I think you know the answer as well as I do. But here's a question. Has the present price drop in any way already reflected the proposed new issuance of shares? In other words, how much has the proposed new issuance of shares already been reflected in the price? Obviously we haven't known about it until now, but surely somewhere, others have known. What do you think? If the present price does not in any way reflect the issuance of new shares, then in what way do you think the price will be affected by them? The bad point of the proposed new shares is obvious...but is there a good point too? Yes, for the future, I think there could be. New shares could mean more money raised....more money raised could mean new ventures.....new ventures could mean new profits.....but the question is...."How long will it take?" Is there something BIG brewing around the corner that can help absorb those new shares? Or is there not? Each person has to decide for themselves what the answer is. Juanita

To: Mark S. Schroeder who wrote (27398)	9/27/1998 11:50:00 AM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Mark, you wrote:"Now something that really throws a 5/8" wrench in the spokes.....they want to issues 1,000,000 shares of stock??????? #1 that is allegedly NOT, what the letter said so you may be getting caried away just a bit. "The purpose of the meeting will be to consider the following matter's 1. amendment to the articles of incorporation to authorize three classes of shares as follows. voting common stock 50 million nonvoting common stock 50 million preferred stock 50 million" Message 5848611 If they authorize 150 Mil, the obvious concern is dilution.... IF, they "ISSUE" more shares. The authorization itself, is one thing the issuance of more shares is another. I respect your concerns as i do of others and i share them as well there needs to be more communication from the company as to wether or not this meeting is going to in fact take place or has that plan changed? If so then why and If Not then Why not? and what exactly are the purposes of this Authorization... An EXPLANATION IS IN ORDER BEFORE THIS MEETING IS SUPPOSED TO TAKE PLACE, IF in fact this meeting is going to take place. As Far as I know there are currently 100 Mil shares Authorized at present..so we are looking at basically 50 Million New shares being Authorized and I guess they will be "preferred" shares ie for Institutional Stakes? I really am out of the loop here and Don't really know what is going on...But, as a Shareholder I surely want to Know...