Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary S who wrote (7638)	9/27/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Respond to of 14226

Gary - from your old post, watchers might want to see the Calibre of Sabin again: is Sabin a public company? No. You can check them out at: sabinmetal.com

To: Gary S who wrote (7638)	9/27/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Gary, <<your conclusion is at best premature and at worst incorrect>> Very well may be, my purchase of GPGI higher demonstrates my poor judgement. However, I see a pattern here and have 32 years experience as a scientist/engineer to support that judgement. Sometimes a hypothesis draws review that enhances understanding, thanks.

To: Gary S who wrote (7638)	9/27/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: Ed Fishbaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Gary I believe that Richard is correct. From what I have gathered, the color of the impregnated resin is not a reliable indication of the concentration of precious metals. Assays are the only way to go and they must reflect adequate sampling. This is why McKay is setting up a strict procedure. As I understand it there will be many resin units set up at the mill and that by staggering the introduction of resin it will be possible to sample the columns in such a way as to assure that the completed columns are fully saturated. At that point the final assay prior to shipment should match what Sabin finds in their assay. Regards, Ed