Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougjn who wrote (5688)	9/27/1998 3:53:00 PM
From: wonk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Doug: This is an opinion piece worthy of the read. search.washingtonpost.com ww

To: dougjn who wrote (5688)	9/27/1998 5:26:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Respond to of 67261

Great post! Thanks, Dipy.

To: dougjn who wrote (5688)	9/27/1998 5:43:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

Does the federal statute distinguish between small and large perjury? Is that like theft and grand theft? JLA

To: dougjn who wrote (5688)	9/27/1998 8:11:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Do we really want inquisitions into the sex lives of all of our elected officials? And perhaps the rest of us as well? again, you are glossing over the fact that these sexcapades took place in the President's office, the Oval Office, in which he carries out his Presidential, very public duties in our behalf, in Our House, a Historical House, the closest thing we have to a royal palace in the USA. If Clinton is suspected again of using the Oval Office as sexual playground for illicit sex romps, then yes, that "sex life" is my business, and you better believe that I want it to be investigated. If anyone else in the United States had had a sexual romp in the Oval Office, and it was discovered, you can bet they would have probably been arrested for lewd public behavior. Get a grip on reality, doug, and quit trying to gloss over the facts. And this is simply the public office sex part. To top that off that he willfully perjured himself to cover it up during a civil sexual harassment trial--there's another offense, and a serious legal one. This slime must be held accountable--whether or not we chose to "forgive him", not that he's ever asked.