Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (5800)	9/27/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

You're nuts. Starr didn't embarrass me. He embarrassed Clinton, evidently because now Clinton apparently decided that maybe having oral sex with an intern in the Oval Office wasn't such a great idea. Clinton is the one who is an international embarrassment. Which is one reason he should be impeached: He's disgraced the Office of the Presidency. You're totally wrong about the reason for the details, and we both know that if they weren't there, you, like those sychophants when the tapes first came out, would be crying "it's all alleged, there's no proof", etc. Been there, done that, on these threads, in particular the "Did Slick Boink Monica" thread. Must I go back and dig up the endless examples of this drivel? "What about innocent until proven guilty, hey, what about that! It's not fair, you can't make a judgement without the proof!". Etc. It's all there, back in January. So yes, the details were required, to refute Clinton's continual lying.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (5800)	9/27/1998 9:44:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

>>..infamous holyer than thou crusade to cleanse the world of what he thinks is inappropriate sex. I see. So you approve of the President using the Oval Office for sexual romps with subordinate employees? Btw, what Clinton did with Lewinsky is actually Sexual Harassment, according to Federal Law. That's what I was told, anyway. I think most people think Clinton is what he is: a scumbag.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (5800)	9/28/1998 8:42:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Tiresome but since you keep repeating your mantra that the sexual details were not necessary to the Starr report it must be repeated. Clinton refused to answer direct questions about sex with Monica and Starr included the details in his report to show that Clinton perjured himself in the PJ case even assuming his tortured definition of sexual relations was as he stated. Apparently you subscribe to the theory that says if you repeat a lie enough times it will become a truth. JLA