SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Maxam Gold Corp. OBB:MXAM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (5796)9/28/1998 1:32:00 AM
From: GlobalMarine  Respond to of 11603
 
Richard: You're the dense one. Leaching 20 pounds of ore is NOT a recovery method. A recovery method involves excavating the ore, preparing the ore for leaching, leaching, recovering metal from solution and finally disposing the tailings.

<<get lost>> I see you're reverting to your usual panic attacks instead of trying to calmly address the issues I've raised. For instance, why did the company shelve its pilot plant after the first test failed? I've tried to figure out how such an action could be consistent with a recovery method that is supposed to work but have been unsuccessful. Since you have all the answers, please answer me this one question, and if you can explain it to my satisfaction, I will place a market buy order for 100,000 shares, OK?

AGAIN, IF THE RECOVERY PROCESS WORKS, WHY WAS THE PILOT PLANT SHELVED AFTER THE FIRST TEST FAILED? This is an honest question, and I'd like your honest, direct answer to it. Don't try to worm your way out by saying something like, "The recovery process works...take some medication...isn't it obvious?...ask Runyon...you're wrong...define 'is'...I was never alone with her..." I've asked a direct answer, and I'd like a direct answer: IF THE RECOVERY PROCESS WORKS, WHY WAS THE PILOT PLANT SHELVED AFTER THE FIRST TEST FAILED? Please answer, as I would like very much to believe the process does work.